Raptor said:Keep him banned, he's like the mascot for the words 'Low Quality'.
Alive said:I couldn't agree with you more, Raptor. Someone who breaks rules and then ledges innocence can stay banned in my opinion.
Slacker said:Why would you quote him and delete all positive in the comment. It stated he was JK man lol
I dont understand why everyone post on these saying "let him back" or "no fuck you stay banned" nothing we state has any toll on the decision made by staff lmao. The only reason these are open for public is that way we can see whom is trying to come back and the poster can not claim that the decision was corrupt. In my honest opinion I feel that the only one whom should post on these is the person directly affected by the scammer / banned member.
Pick said:Raptor originally posted without the jk , he edited his post sometime after alive quoted him , we were in a aim chat together . i am also pretty sure that if at least 4 staff members do not want him back he stays banned , if thats how the system works , but im not sure.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?