Do you think Dubstep is becoming a huge problem?

wale said:
If it's not on topic stop discussing it. Being the OP your just inviting me to discuss when you yourself do.

Regarding Wiz: Ink my whole body came out before the songs on rolling papers.

Get off this thread, thank you.

>Implying I care also.
 
Dubstep events don't have more violence whatsoever. It depends whether people are drinking or not.

Go to an event by a deathcore/death metal band, it's also violent due to the "Moshers".
 
And normally people are drinking at those events. I've actually never heard of one that didn't have alcoholic beverages. And what is going to have more violence a Miley Cyrus concert or a Dub Step concert? I think number 2...
 
wale said:
And normally people are drinking at those events. I've actually never heard of one that didn't have alcoholic beverages. And what is going to have more violence a Miley Cyrus concert or a Dub Step concert? I think number 2...

That's a terrible comparison.
There will be non-prepubescent children at the Miley Cyrus event and at the Dubstep events it's 16+ for people who WANT to rave and have a laugh. The violence is purely because of the alcohol if anything, violence is usually afterwards.
 
And Raves tend to have violence and be more intense. If you don't like that one I'll compare it to a country concert. Tons of drinking there but the fights are much lower.
 
wale said:
And Raves tend to have violence and be more intense. If you don't like that one I'll compare it to a country concert. Tons of drinking there but the fights are much lower.

What exactly are you claiming?
 
That Dubstep may lead to violence and contains fighting words. Comparing the Dubstep events to the events of other genres of music the rate of violence is much higher. That is an issue with dubstep.
 
wale said:
That Dubstep may lead to violence and contains fighting words. Comparing the Dubstep events to the events of other genres of music the rate of violence is much higher. That is an issue with dubstep.

Dubstep isn't violent whatsoever, nor does it contain "fighting words" or they may contain them but it doesn't make a difference , however most genres have "fighting words" in them.

The only possible reason it starts more "violence" is because of the actual audience it was.

I, personally haven't witnessed a single fight at a mash-up.
 
Maybe we've had different experiences but you can't honestly say that the crowds attracted to a Dubstep event is less likely to use drugs or lead to violence then those attending a Country or pop concert.
 
wale said:
Maybe we've had different experiences but you can't honestly say that the crowds attracted to a Dubstep event is less likely to use drugs or lead to violence then those attending a Country or pop concert.

are*

Once again, a stupid comparison.
Both audiences are completely different.

People who attend Dubstep events usually go to clubs often.
Violence usually depends on how people react to other people, not the music event itself.
 
I was trolling bro.

But you need to understand that the audience Dubstep has are people who would usually get drunk outside of event with friends etc.

It's not the music, it's the atmospheric feeling of it all which causes violence as well as the alcohol, oh and peer pressure to "start" something.
 
I don't understand why you would you troll me when I try and have a serious talk.

And I understand you're saying its the people which is partly and atmosphere which is partly true but they would come together a lot less and in smaller numbers without Dubstep.

And Yes I do take the devils advocate for the sake of debate sometimes.
 
Whoever doesn't know music physiologically effects the brain then you're retarded.

But at least we've come to an agreement.
 
Back
Top