Yeah...Fuck guns

RE: Yeah...f*ck guns

Yes, because without a gun there is no such thing as murder!

I am also against spoons and forks because I have seen them make people fat.

Automobiles cause accidents/wrecks and pollution, so I am also against those too.

:)
 
RE: Yeah...f*ck guns

1cPeq


Nice.

I read the title of this thread again "Yeah... fuck guns", but guns don't kill people, people kill people, right? Guns are just a tool to help them (but maybe you wanted to say something else with the title?)

That dude is just fucked up. Killing his mother, the human that made him live, and sister, and then admitting it just like that "hey I just killed my mom and sister, I'm a boss right?", that's just wrong in many ways, both parts.
 
RE: Yeah...f*ck guns

That is fucking mental :agape:

Crazy to think there is kids like that in this world..
 
RE: Yeah...f*ck guns

Deathcrow said:
Yes, because without a gun there is no such thing as murder!

I am also against spoons and forks because I have seen them make people fat.

Automobiles cause accidents/wrecks and pollution, so I am also against those too.

:)

But what did he kill them with? He killed them with a gun. Yes, he could of used a knife but he used a gun.
 
RE: Yeah...f*ck guns

Adam said:
But what did he kill them with? He killed them with a gun. Yes, he could of used a knife but he used a gun.

You are looking at the article wrong.

It is about a kid killing people, which is a horrible thing. Something is obviously messed up with him. What he did to kill them or what he used to kill them is irrelevant. The outcome is the same and is bad.
 
RE: Yeah...f*ck guns

Adam said:
Deathcrow said:
Yes, because without a gun there is no such thing as murder!

I am also against spoons and forks because I have seen them make people fat.

Automobiles cause accidents/wrecks and pollution, so I am also against those too.

:)

But what did he kill them with? He killed them with a gun. Yes, he could of used a knife but he used a gun.

I don't know how this would be translated but, in spanish you can call a knife a "arma blanca", "arma" being gun/weapon and "blanca" meaning white (literal translation), a knife can be considered a gun too. Search in Google images for "armas blancas" (plural for arma blanca) and you'll see a ton of knives and a few more things.
 
RE: Yeah...f*ck guns

Adam said:
Deathcrow said:
Yes, because without a gun there is no such thing as murder!

I am also against spoons and forks because I have seen them make people fat.

Automobiles cause accidents/wrecks and pollution, so I am also against those too.

:)

But what did he kill them with? He killed them with a gun. Yes, he could of used a knife but he used a gun.



He used a gun because it was available. If there was no gun he would have stabbed them to death. If there was no knife he would have beaten them/suffocated them to death. If he was weaker than them he would have burnt the house down.

Moral of the story: He would have killed them either way
 
RE: Yeah...f*ck guns

Against religion says Science is the way... Guns were made with some science. Mechanics... something Religion isn't blamed for. So you hate Science now too?
 
RE: Yeah...f*ck guns

Zain said:
Adam said:
Deathcrow said:
Yes, because without a gun there is no such thing as murder!

I am also against spoons and forks because I have seen them make people fat.

Automobiles cause accidents/wrecks and pollution, so I am also against those too.

:)

But what did he kill them with? He killed them with a gun. Yes, he could of used a knife but he used a gun.



He used a gun because it was available. If there was no gun he would have stabbed them to death. If there was no knife he would have beaten them/suffocated them to death. If he was weaker than them he would have burnt the house down.

Moral of the story: He would have killed them either way

Effort required to kill with gun = 0. Effort required to kill with knife = 5/10. Effort to kill by beating 10/10. Effort to kill by house fire = not really easy. They could of easily escaped.

You can defend against a knife attack, especially if it is 2 vs 1. You can very easily defend against a person using no weapon. You cannot defend against a gun.
 
RE: Yeah...f*ck guns

Mike said:
Against religion says Science is the way... Guns were made with some science. Mechanics... something Religion isn't blamed for. So you hate Science now too?

Typical west baptist church member.


Adam said:
Zain said:
Adam said:
But what did he kill them with? He killed them with a gun. Yes, he could of used a knife but he used a gun.



He used a gun because it was available. If there was no gun he would have stabbed them to death. If there was no knife he would have beaten them/suffocated them to death. If he was weaker than them he would have burnt the house down.

Moral of the story: He would have killed them either way

Effort required to kill with gun = 0. Effort required to kill with knife = 5/10. Effort to kill by beating 10/10. Effort to kill by house fire = not really easy. They could of easily escaped.

You can defend against a knife attack, especially if it is 2 vs 1. You can very easily defend against a person using no weapon. You cannot defend against a gun.

Yes you can, Class III body armor.

299$ at most gun shows.

>2012
>Not constantly wearing plate rig
Shiggty diggty boo bop doo wop
 
RE: Yeah...f*ck guns

this shit is fucked up beyond belief. And yet he seems perfectly happy.

evolution wouldnt have let this happen, survival of the fittest, and that braindead scumbag would have died left to his own devices.. but no we had to break the human being evolutionary process.

Its unfair to stereotype all people with issues as murders, but look how normal he acts, how can you not after hearing of this story?!

DAFUQ?!
killer6n-3-web.jpg

killer6n-4-web.jpg
 
RE: Yeah...f*ck guns

Mike said:
Against religion says Science is the way... Guns were made with some science. Mechanics... something Religion isn't blamed for. So you hate Science now too?

I'm pretty sure it doesn't say science is wrong in the Bible. I can hate parts of science obviously. I'm not a big fan of Anthrax. It doesn't mean I hate science as a whole. I hate religion as a whole.


Knife said:
Mike said:
Against religion says Science is the way... Guns were made with some science. Mechanics... something Religion isn't blamed for. So you hate Science now too?

Typical west baptist church member.


Adam said:
Zain said:
He used a gun because it was available. If there was no gun he would have stabbed them to death. If there was no knife he would have beaten them/suffocated them to death. If he was weaker than them he would have burnt the house down.

Moral of the story: He would have killed them either way

Effort required to kill with gun = 0. Effort required to kill with knife = 5/10. Effort to kill by beating 10/10. Effort to kill by house fire = not really easy. They could of easily escaped.

You can defend against a knife attack, especially if it is 2 vs 1. You can very easily defend against a person using no weapon. You cannot defend against a gun.

Yes you can, Class III body armor.

299$ at most gun shows.

>2012
>Not constantly wearing plate rig
Shiggty diggty boo bop doo wop



Boom. Head shot.


w24 wagers said:
this shit is fucked up beyond belief. And yet he seems perfectly happy.

evolution wouldnt have let this happen, survival of the fittest, and that braindead scumbag would have died left to his own devices.. but no we had to break the human being evolutionary process.

Its unfair to stereotype all people with issues as murders, but look how normal he acts, how can you not after hearing of this story?!

DAFUQ?!
killer6n-3-web.jpg

killer6n-4-web.jpg

Is that his sister?
 
RE: Yeah...f*ck guns

Adam said:
Zain said:
Adam said:
But what did he kill them with? He killed them with a gun. Yes, he could of used a knife but he used a gun.



He used a gun because it was available. If there was no gun he would have stabbed them to death. If there was no knife he would have beaten them/suffocated them to death. If he was weaker than them he would have burnt the house down.

Moral of the story: He would have killed them either way

Effort required to kill with gun = 0. Effort required to kill with knife = 5/10. Effort to kill by beating 10/10. Effort to kill by house fire = not really easy. They could of easily escaped.

You can defend against a knife attack, especially if it is 2 vs 1. You can very easily defend against a person using no weapon. You cannot defend against a gun.


He could have easily stabbed them to death in their sleep. I'm not talkin 1 on 1 combat, I'm talkin sneak in their room. And stab them to death.
 
RE: Yeah...f*ck guns




He used a gun because it was available. If there was no gun he would have stabbed them to death. If there was no knife he would have beaten them/suffocated them to death. If he was weaker than them he would have burnt the house down.

Moral of the story: He would have killed them either way
[/quote]

Effort required to kill with gun = 0. Effort required to kill with knife = 5/10. Effort to kill by beating 10/10. Effort to kill by house fire = not really easy. They could of easily escaped.

You can defend against a knife attack, especially if it is 2 vs 1. You can very easily defend against a person using no weapon. You cannot defend against a gun.
[/quote]


How much defense would one have if someone stabbed them to death in their sleep? Do you know how many deaths have happened effortlessly using that method?
[/quote]

It's obviously possible. He goes and stabs his sister while she is sleeping. She feels the pain and starts screaming. The mother hears this and gets up and goes to see what happens. The mother and son are in hand to hand combat. The mother is a martial arts instructor and therefore wins. Now only 1 death has occurred.
 
RE: Yeah...f*ck guns

You sure do have a vivid imagination with your scenarios as to how they would have survived. They would've survived. Unless some ridiculous shit would've happened, they would've died. End of
 
Back
Top