Deathcrow said:Yes, because without a gun there is no such thing as murder!
I am also against spoons and forks because I have seen them make people fat.
Automobiles cause accidents/wrecks and pollution, so I am also against those too.
Adam said:But what did he kill them with? He killed them with a gun. Yes, he could of used a knife but he used a gun.
Adam said:Deathcrow said:Yes, because without a gun there is no such thing as murder!
I am also against spoons and forks because I have seen them make people fat.
Automobiles cause accidents/wrecks and pollution, so I am also against those too.
But what did he kill them with? He killed them with a gun. Yes, he could of used a knife but he used a gun.
Adam said:Deathcrow said:Yes, because without a gun there is no such thing as murder!
I am also against spoons and forks because I have seen them make people fat.
Automobiles cause accidents/wrecks and pollution, so I am also against those too.
But what did he kill them with? He killed them with a gun. Yes, he could of used a knife but he used a gun.
Zain said:Adam said:Deathcrow said:Yes, because without a gun there is no such thing as murder!
I am also against spoons and forks because I have seen them make people fat.
Automobiles cause accidents/wrecks and pollution, so I am also against those too.
But what did he kill them with? He killed them with a gun. Yes, he could of used a knife but he used a gun.
He used a gun because it was available. If there was no gun he would have stabbed them to death. If there was no knife he would have beaten them/suffocated them to death. If he was weaker than them he would have burnt the house down.
Moral of the story: He would have killed them either way
Mike said:Against religion says Science is the way... Guns were made with some science. Mechanics... something Religion isn't blamed for. So you hate Science now too?
Adam said:Zain said:Adam said:But what did he kill them with? He killed them with a gun. Yes, he could of used a knife but he used a gun.
He used a gun because it was available. If there was no gun he would have stabbed them to death. If there was no knife he would have beaten them/suffocated them to death. If he was weaker than them he would have burnt the house down.
Moral of the story: He would have killed them either way
Effort required to kill with gun = 0. Effort required to kill with knife = 5/10. Effort to kill by beating 10/10. Effort to kill by house fire = not really easy. They could of easily escaped.
You can defend against a knife attack, especially if it is 2 vs 1. You can very easily defend against a person using no weapon. You cannot defend against a gun.
Mike said:Against religion says Science is the way... Guns were made with some science. Mechanics... something Religion isn't blamed for. So you hate Science now too?
Knife said:Mike said:Against religion says Science is the way... Guns were made with some science. Mechanics... something Religion isn't blamed for. So you hate Science now too?
Typical west baptist church member.
Adam said:Zain said:He used a gun because it was available. If there was no gun he would have stabbed them to death. If there was no knife he would have beaten them/suffocated them to death. If he was weaker than them he would have burnt the house down.
Moral of the story: He would have killed them either way
Effort required to kill with gun = 0. Effort required to kill with knife = 5/10. Effort to kill by beating 10/10. Effort to kill by house fire = not really easy. They could of easily escaped.
You can defend against a knife attack, especially if it is 2 vs 1. You can very easily defend against a person using no weapon. You cannot defend against a gun.
Yes you can, Class III body armor.
299$ at most gun shows.
>2012
>Not constantly wearing plate rig
Shiggty diggty boo bop doo wop
w24 wagers said:this shit is fucked up beyond belief. And yet he seems perfectly happy.
evolution wouldnt have let this happen, survival of the fittest, and that braindead scumbag would have died left to his own devices.. but no we had to break the human being evolutionary process.
Its unfair to stereotype all people with issues as murders, but look how normal he acts, how can you not after hearing of this story?!
DAFUQ?!
Adam said:Zain said:Adam said:But what did he kill them with? He killed them with a gun. Yes, he could of used a knife but he used a gun.
He used a gun because it was available. If there was no gun he would have stabbed them to death. If there was no knife he would have beaten them/suffocated them to death. If he was weaker than them he would have burnt the house down.
Moral of the story: He would have killed them either way
Effort required to kill with gun = 0. Effort required to kill with knife = 5/10. Effort to kill by beating 10/10. Effort to kill by house fire = not really easy. They could of easily escaped.
You can defend against a knife attack, especially if it is 2 vs 1. You can very easily defend against a person using no weapon. You cannot defend against a gun.
You can defend against a knife attack, especially if it is 2 vs 1. You can very easily defend against a person using no weapon. You cannot defend against a gun.
w24 wagers said:You can defend against a knife attack, especially if it is 2 vs 1. You can very easily defend against a person using no weapon. You cannot defend against a gun.
i beg to differ.
[video=youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_z4IuxAqpE[/video]
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?