Would you kill another human being for $1,000,000?

Brian said:
Hmm, I like this answer, Lmao. Makes a lot of sense.
Click to expand...
OMG! Yo that's what i said in a party last night. XD
But your basically killing a guy for $1,000,000 right?
 
Most likely not, unless they truly deserved to die. Even then I would probably flake out.
Now if it's a life or death situation between the me and person, I would probably be more up to the offer, idk honestly; I couldn't live with the guilt.
 
No, unless they deserved to die the reasons behind it are how it would not only affect you but how it would affect their families. + It would be playing on my mind all the time and make me paranoid always.
 
I would never kill anyone. No matter how much I need the money.
 
I'D KILL SOMEONE IF THERE MINECRAFT WORLD WAS BETTER THAN MINE. I HIGHLY DOUBT ANYONE'S IS AND EVER WILL BE.

- YOUR FRIEND, DECAPITATE
 
For a question like this, I would refer to consequentialist ideology to answer it. However, the circumstances and potential possibilities do dictate my thought process, for example; if I had the opportunity to retrieve the $1,000,000 without murdering an innocent, I would act on it; if I had the opportunity to murder the one offering the cash opportunity and retrieve the money, I would act on it.

For this hypothetical, I'll pretend the only possibilities to choose from are to kill someone innocent or to not. If I were to deny this opportunity, I would also be denying the possibility of saving thousands upon thousands of lives through research, charity, and so on if I were to donate it all. However, if I were to accept the opportunity, it would be the contrary.

Although, despite this question being hypothetical, highly unlikely and unrealistic. I'm still not positive what my conclusion would be if I were face to face with this opportunity in reality, regardless, of already having a sincere and reasonable answer deriving from consequentialist logic.
 
It depends, say I did kill a person, and used the money for good. Then I would be saving lives, and making more peoples better. But on the other hand, I am taking someone's life for the simple reason of money, which is wrong itself.

To me, it would depend on the person. If I was to kill a convicted murderer, and rapist. I would like to think that I would be able to do it for that reason. But if I were to kill say a mother, it would be a different story.
 
Cann!bal said:
For a question like this, I would refer to consequentialist ideology to answer it. However, the circumstances and potential possibilities do dictate my thought process, for example; if I had the opportunity to retrieve the $1,000,000 without murdering an innocent, I would act on it; if I had the opportunity to murder the one offering the cash opportunity and retrieve the money, I would act on it.

For this hypothetical, I'll pretend the only possibilities to choose from are to kill someone innocent or to not. If I were to deny this opportunity, I would also be denying the possibility of saving thousands upon thousands of lives through research, charity, and so on if I were to donate it all. However, if I were to accept the opportunity, it would be the contrary.

Although, despite this question being hypothetical, highly unlikely and unrealistic. I'm still not positive what my conclusion would be if I were face to face with this opportunity in reality, regardless, of already having a sincere and reasonable answer deriving from consequentialist logic.
Click to expand...
For everyone else:
The English translation would be: "most likely, yes".
 
I don't need money, I get a free loan every time I make the bass drop.l
 
Cann!bal said:
For a question like this, I would refer to consequentialist ideology to answer it. However, the circumstances and potential possibilities do dictate my thought process, for example; if I had the opportunity to retrieve the $1,000,000 without murdering an innocent, I would act on it; if I had the opportunity to murder the one offering the cash opportunity and retrieve the money, I would act on it.

For this hypothetical, I'll pretend the only possibilities to choose from are to kill someone innocent or to not. If I were to deny this opportunity, I would also be denying the possibility of saving thousands upon thousands of lives through research, charity, and so on if I were to donate it all. However, if I were to accept the opportunity, it would be the contrary.

Although, despite this question being hypothetical, highly unlikely and unrealistic. I'm still not positive what my conclusion would be if I were face to face with this opportunity in reality, regardless, of already having a sincere and reasonable answer deriving from consequentialist logic.
Click to expand...

Ok, sounds good. Please repeat in English.
 
Shift said:
I would kill them for the 50 dollar transfer fee for my group
Click to expand...
This is the definition of the phrase, "The struggle is real." :p
 
I'd probably do it for $1 billion but definitely not one million lol that's not the price of somebody's life.
 
If I would not get caught sure some people such as child molesters should be killed
 
Brian said:
This is the definition of the phrase, "The struggle is real." :p
Click to expand...
Legitimately laughed out loud at this, pahahah.
 
it depends who I am killing. If it's a random person then yep.
 
That would be dumb because how would you spend the money if your in Jail.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Featured

• General Discussion
• Inactive FK Username Requests

Share this page

Back
Top