Sure thang. I believe in a higher power but not really a god. I respect all religions. All of them.
All Day Win said:i belong to the religion of guthix
All Day Win said:i belong to the religion of guthix
Relapse said:Solidify said:Relapse said:I don't follow any religions but I'm not atheist.
Then you're agnostic.
Its not that I think nothing is known or is true, its I'm just not sure what I personally believe.
wale said:No because he doesn't fall under any of the categories of Agnosticism. It seems that he is just undecided not because evidence leaves him to be but because he doesn't know which evidence to follow.
Solidify said:wale said:No because he doesn't fall under any of the categories of Agnosticism. It seems that he is just undecided not because evidence leaves him to be but because he doesn't know which evidence to follow.
If 'he doesn't know which evidence to follow', theoretically, it's the topic of insufficient or lacking evidence is just undecided not because evidence leaves him to be that is influencing his perspective.
In other words;
'Being undecided because evidence leaves him to be' is essentially the same as being 'undecided because he doesn't know which evidence to follow'. It's the fact that he doesn't know which evidence to follow that makes it so that he undecided.
I hope I didn't lose you. Bottom line, there is not other option for him. Atheist, theist or agnostic (besides the rest of the religions). These agnostic perspective was created and is defined is an effort to uniformly group everyone else together that isn't already sharing a common belief. So in theory, it's like saying, you have to be part of one.
Relapse said:Solidify said:wale said:No because he doesn't fall under any of the categories of Agnosticism. It seems that he is just undecided not because evidence leaves him to be but because he doesn't know which evidence to follow.
If 'he doesn't know which evidence to follow', theoretically, it's the topic of insufficient or lacking evidence is just undecided not because evidence leaves him to be that is influencing his perspective.
In other words;
'Being undecided because evidence leaves him to be' is essentially the same as being 'undecided because he doesn't know which evidence to follow'. It's the fact that he doesn't know which evidence to follow that makes it so that he undecided.
I hope I didn't lose you. Bottom line, there is not other option for him. Atheist, theist or agnostic (besides the rest of the religions). These agnostic perspective was created and is defined is an effort to uniformly group everyone else together that isn't already sharing a common belief. So in theory, it's like saying, you have to be part of one.
The evidence for or against isn't what has me unlabeled.
I am strongly against organized religion, but I don't consider my self atheist because I do believe something happens after death besides just non existence, but I don't really believe in a higher power.
Which is why I consider my self neither an atheist or theist.. I should have explained it in more detail in my first post.
Not as extreme as that but I do share some similar beliefsSolidify said:Relapse said:Solidify said:If 'he doesn't know which evidence to follow', theoretically, it's the topic of insufficient or lacking evidence is just undecided not because evidence leaves him to be that is influencing his perspective.
In other words;
'Being undecided because evidence leaves him to be' is essentially the same as being 'undecided because he doesn't know which evidence to follow'. It's the fact that he doesn't know which evidence to follow that makes it so that he undecided.
I hope I didn't lose you. Bottom line, there is not other option for him. Atheist, theist or agnostic (besides the rest of the religions). These agnostic perspective was created and is defined is an effort to uniformly group everyone else together that isn't already sharing a common belief. So in theory, it's like saying, you have to be part of one.
The evidence for or against isn't what has me unlabeled.
I am strongly against organized religion, but I don't consider my self atheist because I do believe something happens after death besides just non existence, but I don't really believe in a higher power.
Which is why I consider my self neither an atheist or theist.. I should have explained it in more detail in my first post.
Scientology then?
Crysis said:Atheist isn't a Religion, derp.
Oh and I am agnostic.
Relapse said:Crysis said:Atheist isn't a Religion, derp.
Oh and I am agnostic.
Atheist is the belief there is no god, it is a religion. derp.
“Atheism is the position that affirms the non-existence of God. It proposes positive belief rather than mere suspension of disbelief.”Crysis said:Relapse said:Crysis said:Atheist isn't a Religion, derp.
Oh and I am agnostic.
Atheist is the belief there is no god, it is a religion. derp.
Wrong, being Atheist is a disbelief of a God or an "All-knowing creature".
Not a religion.
Relapse said:“Atheism is the position that affirms the non-existence of God. It proposes positive belief rather than mere suspension of disbelief.”Crysis said:Relapse said:Atheist is the belief there is no god, it is a religion. derp.
Wrong, being Atheist is a disbelief of a God or an "All-knowing creature".
Not a religion.
Belief in supernatural beings such as gods.
A distinction between sacred and profane objects.
Ritual acts focused on sacred objects.
A moral code believed to be sanctioned by the gods.
Prayer and other forms of communication with gods.
A more or less total organization of one's life based on the world view.
A social group bound together by the above.We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?