-
Welcome to ForumKorner!
Buy, Sell, Trade, Discuss—All in One Place.
Was 9/11 a hoax?
- Thread starter Zennywop
- Start date
RE: Was 911 a hoax?
That's like denying the Holocaust.
That's like denying the Holocaust.
RE: Was 911 a hoax?
Meaning, it's Obvious.
Zennywop said:
Meaning, it's Obvious.
RE: Was 911 a hoax?
Is that all?
Do you believe it's a hoax?
Cause I can provide evidence that it's not.
Is that all?
Do you believe it's a hoax?
Cause I can provide evidence that it's not.
RE: Was 911 a hoax?
So your saying that the people on that plane never died?
Also, that the country would go to war for OIL when we have all of it right under my state.
George Bush kept the country safe for 7 years. Obama is doing such a wonderful job himself, let's see...
I think 7 stopped attacks? 1 that went wrong with the bomb in times square.
The Elite said:
So your saying that the people on that plane never died?
Also, that the country would go to war for OIL when we have all of it right under my state.
George Bush kept the country safe for 7 years. Obama is doing such a wonderful job himself, let's see...
I think 7 stopped attacks? 1 that went wrong with the bomb in times square.
RE: Was 911 a hoax?
Please notify me of the section of my posts where I stated that the passengers on the plane did not suffer and die. You actually should have no right to invade a country with no valid proof just for oil, when it's clearly there's.
Yes, you'd be safe under George Bush due to the fact that all he did was use brute force to threaten other countries. Power speaks, yes, that's obvious, although George Bush was never a good choice. He, himself caused the murder of thousands and thousands of innocent people.
Let's see, Isreal was on America's side, this incident occurred:
http://www.themodernreligion.com/jihad/sniper.html
He might've kept your country safe, but at what cost, the life's of young children?
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Please notify me of the section of my posts where I stated that the passengers on the plane did not suffer and die. You actually should have no right to invade a country with no valid proof just for oil, when it's clearly there's.
Yes, you'd be safe under George Bush due to the fact that all he did was use brute force to threaten other countries. Power speaks, yes, that's obvious, although George Bush was never a good choice. He, himself caused the murder of thousands and thousands of innocent people.
Let's see, Isreal was on America's side, this incident occurred:
http://www.themodernreligion.com/jihad/sniper.html
He might've kept your country safe, but at what cost, the life's of young children?
RE: Was 911 a hoax?
Where's the Oil? They are still making us pay for it aren't they?
That's war, it's been going on for 1,000's of years. Do we do it intentionally? No, we do not. We try to SAVE as many as we can without harming them.
A video obtained by the Associated Press on April 20, 2007 shows a young boy, appearing to be around 12 years of age, beheading a man identified as Ghulam Nabi, a Pakistani militant accused of betraying the Taliban. According to the AP report, "A continuous 2 1/2-minute shot then shows the victim lying on his side on a patch of rubble-strewn ground. A man holds Nabi by his beard while the boy, wearing a camouflage military jacket and oversized white sneakers, cuts into the throat. Other men and boys call out "Allahu akbar!" — "God is great!" — as blood spurts from the wound. The film, overlain with jihadi songs, then shows the boy hacking and slashing at the man's neck until the head is severed."
What are you trying to prove?
The Elite said:
Where's the Oil? They are still making us pay for it aren't they?
That's war, it's been going on for 1,000's of years. Do we do it intentionally? No, we do not. We try to SAVE as many as we can without harming them.
A video obtained by the Associated Press on April 20, 2007 shows a young boy, appearing to be around 12 years of age, beheading a man identified as Ghulam Nabi, a Pakistani militant accused of betraying the Taliban. According to the AP report, "A continuous 2 1/2-minute shot then shows the victim lying on his side on a patch of rubble-strewn ground. A man holds Nabi by his beard while the boy, wearing a camouflage military jacket and oversized white sneakers, cuts into the throat. Other men and boys call out "Allahu akbar!" — "God is great!" — as blood spurts from the wound. The film, overlain with jihadi songs, then shows the boy hacking and slashing at the man's neck until the head is severed."
What are you trying to prove?
RE: Was 911 a hoax?
Your reply shows that neither side is right. I was never defending the opposition, I was only stating that George Bush was never a good leader, the election of him caused worse outcomes than good.
Miss Hannah Minx said:
Your reply shows that neither side is right. I was never defending the opposition, I was only stating that George Bush was never a good leader, the election of him caused worse outcomes than good.
RE: Was 911 a hoax?
There's always bad presidents. People are going to hate them, and people are going to love them. That's why we have an 'election' if it was a communist country we wouldn't have a choice.
The Elite said:
There's always bad presidents. People are going to hate them, and people are going to love them. That's why we have an 'election' if it was a communist country we wouldn't have a choice.
RE: Was 911 a hoax?
911 could have been a hoax and may have not been. It was planned at a very smart time whoever did it. It did cause a MASSIVE controversy and whoever did it got what they wanted. Anyways, by looking at what Miss HannahMinx and The Elite has said, I really can see the points between them.
911 could have been a hoax and may have not been. It was planned at a very smart time whoever did it. It did cause a MASSIVE controversy and whoever did it got what they wanted. Anyways, by looking at what Miss HannahMinx and The Elite has said, I really can see the points between them.
RE: Was 911 a hoax?
There is no chance that 911 was a hoax. As bad a leader Bush was he never did harm his own people. Sure he may have lost soldiers in the war but again that is unintentional, Bush would not have caused that to happen no matter what the motives were. If Bush wanted oil he simply would have invaded no questions asked he did not ever need an excuse to invade as he was indeed president.
There is no chance that 911 was a hoax. As bad a leader Bush was he never did harm his own people. Sure he may have lost soldiers in the war but again that is unintentional, Bush would not have caused that to happen no matter what the motives were. If Bush wanted oil he simply would have invaded no questions asked he did not ever need an excuse to invade as he was indeed president.
RE: Was 911 a hoax?
I believe the 911 was caused by the illuminati .
secret conspiracy man ..
I believe the 911 was caused by the illuminati .
secret conspiracy man ..
