User groups suggestion

[Pandas]

Well I thought that they could be sorted into difficulty to get into. For example; FOOL- Expert. But something easy like... Mob ( I think its easy to get into ) So there is difficulty.

Simple;
Medium;
Hard;
Expert.

And maybe the same for awards.

 

[Doom]

I'm not getting what you mean.

 

[gunnar]

There aren't really just specifications to get in, the leaders have to like (or tolerate) you.

 

[Pandas]

@Goofball What I'm trying to say is, that there's like a list, but out in to a range of the difficulty to get into the group or earn the award.

 

[Critical]

Mob is easy to join? Why don't you go apply and see if you're accepted.

 

[Pandas]

@Critical I have, no reply Probably because I'm new

 

[One]

I get what you're saying. But ultimately it's up to the leader. Just show that you are a HQ member and dedicated to making the forum better and you'll catch someone's eye eventually.

 

[Pandas]

@Internet I get what your saying, but it could also depend on the achievements you must have to join that group...

 

[Exist]

Getting accepted into Mob is as easy as it was to get out of Auschwitz alive in 1944. Maybe that'll give a good indication on how hard it is to be accepted. But yeah, this suggestion confuses me. Most group owners have to like you or deem you "HQ" in order for you to be approved/accepted.

 

[Pandas]

In that case, I guess I still need a little bit of growing until I'll be able to join groups :/

 

[jason]

Who would determine this, the usergroup's owner(s)?

Personally, I think this is useless.