This is sad.

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's actually pretty decent.
 
Less than half the people that sign up on runegear post. That's pretty sad. That means we don't appear to have much to offer. That needs to change.

RuneGear being down doesn't really have much to do with the statistic above.
 
Look at the statistics for most other forums. Take HF as an example. Just because it's a bigger forum shouldn't be different.

~50% is fairly decent.
 
I agree, compared to other forums we are doing great, but why not try to be 100% Why think that 42% is good enough?
 
eXero said:
I agree, compared to other forums we are doing great, but why not try to be 100% Why think that 42% is good enough?

Because people have things to do?

You're making no sense right now 100 percent that would be 60 percent spam bots or just plane spam.
 
eXero said:
I agree, compared to other forums we are doing great, but why not try to be 100% Why think that 42% is good enough?

You want every member that signs up to Rune Gear to post?

We don't have mind-controlling powers, so how do we accomplish that?
 
Says Carbon. I didn't say we should be 100% either, but less than 50% is unacceptable, or so I think.

@Dykerosoft - We need to offer something that they can't resist not posting for.
 
eXero said:
Says Carbon. I didn't say we should be 100% either, but less than 50% is unacceptable, or so I think.

@Dykerosoft - We need to offer something that they can't resist not posting for.



There's your problem, you're thinking.
 
eXero said:
Says Carbon. I didn't say we should be 100% either, but less than 50% is unacceptable, or so I think.

Can I have the website of the fourm you run please? I would like to see if its above 50%
 
Who said I was judging anything? I didn't say runegear was shit did I? No. I said it was sad that we only have a 42% post:member rate, which I believe should, at a minimum be 50%.
 
eXero said:
Who said I was judging anything? I didn't say runegear was shit did I? No. I said it was sad that we only have a 42% post:member rate, which I believe should, at a minimum be 50%.

You're contradicting yourself, you're making about as much sense as Anne Franks drum kit.
 
eXero said:
Who said I was judging anything? I didn't say runegear was shit did I? No. I said it was sad that we only have a 42% post:member rate, which I believe should, at a minimum be 50%.

So your fourm has 50%? Nice link?
 
Why don't I have a right to judge anything, if I am? I am a member here, I am an upgraded member here, and I feel, as a member that 42% is not good enough.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top