Space the Scammer

[Coder]

You can not fully blame Samuel, this is like purchasing a car and it breaking down on you. You can not FULLY blame the car company, it is partly your fault for not checking and making sure 100%.

I'm not blaming anyone.. I've always been cool with him. I have nothing against him. I am just pointing out.. if the account had multiple owners the username should of been swapped first before being sold. If hope didn't ask enough questions about the security of the account as well as its history then he is at fault to.

 

[Krish]

I'm not blaming anyone.. I've always been cool with him. I have nothing against him. I am just pointing out.. if the account had multiple owners the username should of been swapped first before being sold. If hope didn't ask enough questions about the security of the account as well as its history then he is at fault to.

Let me know if you have any more questions regarding this topic buddy, thanks for the input.

 

[Hurt]

I'd like to bring this screenshot into this argument.
@PPP said this:

He then swapped @si and now he is not replying to me : http://gyazo.com/db7ca4eb554688955f172bd812c89a48

with this image presented:

Notice the name the e-mail is addressed to, "sigotswappedfucckkkkk". Why would this be the name?
Why would Space change the name on the account to "Sigotswappedfucckkkkk"?
Saying "Si Got Swapped, Fuck" leads me to assume that someone, presumably Sam, was upset that Si got swapped.
ALSO, I fail to see ANY proof that Leo/@space owns [email protected]. There is 0 proof of this, so how do we know it's his e-mail?

I don't see any proof that this was his e-mail.
In the Kik screenshots provided by Sam, there is absolutely no proof that he is sending and receiving messages from Leo's actual kik.
The profile picture is the same, but anybody can take that and apply it to another account, especially if they are sending messages from their phone (Kik #1) to bluestacks (Kik #2) like @PPP provided screenshots of.

I'd like to see full video proof of Sam recording his Kik app, opening the conversation with Space, and then going to Space's profile to reveal the username.

Those kik messages can be faked just as easily as Space's BTC sending.

I also do not see proof on http://instagram.com/SI proving that it is Space.

I find it odd that both http://instagram.com/si and http://instagram.com/oh (the instagrams in question) have 1 post, 0 followers, and 0 following, as well as no avatar.

 

[Krish]

I'd like to bring this screenshot into this argument.
@PPP said this:
with this image presented:

Notice the name the e-mail is addressed to, "sigotswappedfucckkkkk". Why would this be the name?
Why would Space change the name on the account to "Sigotswappedfucckkkkk"?
Saying "Si Got Swapped, Fuck" leads me to assume that someone, presumably Sam, was upset that Si got swapped.
ALSO, I fail to see ANY proof that Leo/@space owns [email protected]. There is 0 proof of this, so how do we know it's his e-mail?

I don't see any proof that this was his e-mail.
In the Kik screenshots provided by Sam, there is absolutely no proof that he is sending and receiving messages from Leo's actual kik.
The profile picture is the same, but anybody can take that and apply it to another account, especially if they are sending messages from their phone (Kik #1) to bluestacks (Kik #2) like @PPP provided screenshots of.

I'd like to see full video proof of Sam recording his Kik app, opening the conversation with Space, and then going to Space's profile to reveal the username.

Those kik messages can be faked just as easily as Space's BTC sending.

I also do not see proof on http://instagram.com/SI proving that it is Space.

I find it odd that both http://instagram.com/si and http://instagram.com/oh (the instagrams in question) have 1 post, 0 followers, and 0 following, as well as no avatar.

Here's your proof space owns splatter buddy: https://www.forumkorner.com/thread-235405-post-2055809.html#pid2055809 he tried to sell it to @Bomb

The name got changed to "sigotswappedfucckkkkk" You're saying that it was samuel that did this? Why would samuel change it to "Si Got Swapped FUCKKKK" Why would samuel be mad? It had to have been space because if samuel did scam he wouldn't be sad or angry that Si got Swapped.

"I also do not see proof on http://instagram.com/SI proving that it is Space."

You don't see any proof its Samuel either. That's invalid evidence as nothing can be derived from it.

"I find it odd that both http://instagram.com/si and http://instagram.com/oh (the instagrams in question) have 1 post, 0 followers, and 0 following, as well as no avatar."

I don't find that odd at all, why is it odd?

"I'd like to see full video proof of Sam recording his Kik app" Such evidence is not required due to the PM's that we have, excess evidence as such and the questioning of it will only pollute the case at hand.

---

"Saying "Si Got Swapped, Fuck" leads me to assume that someone, presumably Sam, was upset that Si got swapped."

You're contradicting yourself, if you're saying Sam is mad that space got swapped. That means SPACE DID SWAP Si. Or else why would sam be mad? Therefore SPACE has possession of the IG.

Which disproves: "I also do not see proof on http://instagram.com/SI proving that it is Space."

As you just 100% disproved yourself.

 

[Hurt]

Here's your proof space owns splatter buddy: https://www.forumkorner.com/thread-235405-post-2055809.html#pid2055809 he tried to sell it to @Bomb

The name got changed to "sigotswappedfucckkkkk" You're saying that it was samuel that did this? Why would samuel change it to "Si Got Swapped FUCKKKK" Why would samuel be mad? It had to have been space because if samuel did scam he wouldn't be sad or angry that Si got Swapped.

"I also do not see proof on http://instagram.com/SI proving that it is Space."

You don't see any proof its Samuel either. That's invalid evidence as nothing can be derived from it.

"I find it odd that both http://instagram.com/si and http://instagram.com/oh (the instagrams in question) have 1 post, 0 followers, and 0 following, as well as no avatar."

I don't find that odd at all, why is it odd?

"I'd like to see full video proof of Sam recording his Kik app" Such evidence is not required due to the PM's that we have, excess evidence as such and the questioning of it will only pollute the case at hand.

Alright, so it was indeed Space that swapped it.
However, it's still odd that @si and @oh are both looking the exact same at the moment, as both look the exact same when not logged in or following them.
It's odd because they both look the exact same. You'd think someone would at least put an avatar on one of them? It looks suspicious IMO.

Also, the evidence IS required because there is 0 proof that is infact Spaces kik. I can easily fake kik convos between another user and myself to frame them. It's invalid without full evidence.

 

[Krish]

Alright, so it was indeed Space that swapped it.
However, it's still odd that @si and @oh are both looking the exact same at the moment, as both look the exact same when not logged in or following them.
It's odd because they both look the exact same. You'd think someone would at least put an avatar on one of them? It looks suspicious IMO.

Also, the evidence IS required because there is 0 proof that is infact Spaces kik. I can easily fake kik convos between another user and myself to frame them. It's invalid without full evidence.

"Alright, so it was indeed Space that swapped it."

See, now you're getting it, Space swapped it and has the IG. You said it yourself just now. "it was indeed Space that swapped it."

"Also, the evidence IS required"

The Kik messages were NOT included in this report, they were NOT analyzed what so ever in this report due to the fact they can be fake. Please stop trying to bring in more evidence. I've only included solid evidence in this report.

"However, it's still odd that @si and @oh are both looking the exact same at the moment"

Something looking "odd" is not evidence what so ever. You must build from that "looking odd" statement.