Rights
At Rune Gear, you are:
- Entitled to your own opinion.
Rights
At Rune Gear, you are:
- Enjoy yourself here at Rune Gear.
Life said:Yellow. If it was blue staff wouldn't have a job to do.
Dykerosoft said:I'll clean up all of the shit that that kind leaves behind.
Gum said:Rules are meant to be broken. A bigger forum is a better forum. And as said above the point of staff is to keep things running smoothly.
I voted yellowww.
Solidify said:Life said:Yellow. If it was blue staff wouldn't have a job to do.
Staff is supposed to be dependent on the forum. Not the other way around. That's why you hire workers when there is labor to be done but you let them off when there's no work to be done. In other words, we're not supposed to make work for someone. If there is work to do, then we assign someone to it. That's why when you open a forum to the public, you have very few, if any, staff members. Take a look at most other forums and you'll notice our staff to user-base ratio is slightly higher. I'll use a very successful website most of us are aware of as an example; Hack Forums.
That's 8 staff members for nearly a quarter of a million members while Rune Gear already has;
5 staff members for less than 2% of Hack Forum's user-base, not to mention the 8 moderators Rune Gear has. And you can tell I'm serious about this considering I'm a moderator as well.
I know this is not Hack Forums and management doesn't intend to run their website as if it were but surely we can derive from this web-forum, given it's success. It's a prime example.
Rune Gear is supposed to please it's user-base with the content and insight it has to over, not supply jobs. The workload comes with it if need be. From what I'm hearing, most of you have acknowledged the issue at hand as well as the low quality we have;
Dykerosoft said:I'll clean up all of the shit that that kind leaves behind.
but would much rather keep it to keep yourselves busy. That's not really productive in my humble opinion.
And lastly, there are just as many people favor of the reform I've suggested as there are opposed (see poll results). The problem is that none of them have the backbone to reply due to the image of how a forum should be that we've undoubtedly fabricated.
Gum said:Rules are meant to be broken. A bigger forum is a better forum. And as said above the point of staff is to keep things running smoothly.
I voted yellowww.
Rules are meant to be broken? We're did you pick up that mentality?
And a bigger forums is not always better. Sometimes the quality of the forum's users can make all the difference.
Gum said:Solidify said:Life said:Yellow. If it was blue staff wouldn't have a job to do.
Staff is supposed to be dependent on the forum. Not the other way around. That's why you hire workers when there is labor to be done but you let them off when there's no work to be done. In other words, we're not supposed to make work for someone. If there is work to do, then we assign someone to it. That's why when you open a forum to the public, you have very few, if any, staff members. Take a look at most other forums and you'll notice our staff to user-base ratio is slightly higher. I'll use a very successful website most of us are aware of as an example; Hack Forums.
That's 8 staff members for nearly a quarter of a million members while Rune Gear already has;
5 staff members for less than 2% of Hack Forum's user-base, not to mention the 8 moderators Rune Gear has. And you can tell I'm serious about this considering I'm a moderator as well.
I know this is not Hack Forums and management doesn't intend to run their website as if it were but surely we can derive from this web-forum, given it's success. It's a prime example.
Rune Gear is supposed to please it's user-base with the content and insight it has to over, not supply jobs. The workload comes with it if need be. From what I'm hearing, most of you have acknowledged the issue at hand as well as the low quality we have;
Dykerosoft said:I'll clean up all of the shit that that kind leaves behind.
but would much rather keep it to keep yourselves busy. That's not really productive in my humble opinion.
And lastly, there are just as many people favor of the reform I've suggested as there are opposed (see poll results). The problem is that none of them have the backbone to reply due to the image of how a forum should be that we've undoubtedly fabricated.
Gum said:Rules are meant to be broken. A bigger forum is a better forum. And as said above the point of staff is to keep things running smoothly.
I voted yellowww.
Rules are meant to be broken? We're did you pick up that mentality?
And a bigger forums is not always better. Sometimes the quality of the forum's users can make all the difference.
It's some canadian hippy thing. I just thought of it and was bored.
Although true bigger isn't always better(my body is proof of that), we're not at that point yet. Nothing near there. I believe we need more members still. Being strict and not allowing anything won't help. So maybe when this becomes an issue we would see how we could work on it, but not yet.
Justin said:Rules ARE ment to be broken. If rules weren't supposed to be broken, then what do Moderators do?
Basically it's like this,
No rules = No Cops = No Protection = A @Crysis
See what i did thar?
Gum said:Justin said:Rules ARE ment to be broken. If rules weren't supposed to be broken, then what do Moderators do?
Basically it's like this,
No rules = No Cops = No Protection = A @Crysis
See what i did thar?
I'm blind you jerk... jk lol. I knew there was something with that but I was to lazy to think. Thanks xD.
If there are no rules though, everyones doing whats right! A perfect world!! Brilliant?
Gum said:It's some canadian hippy thing. I just thought of it and was bored.
Although true bigger isn't always better(my body is proof of that), we're not at that point yet. Nothing near there. I believe we need more members still. Being strict and not allowing anything won't help. So maybe when this becomes an issue we would see how we could work on it, but not yet.
EDIT: Just thought I'd mention what you have here is a pretty cool thought. I'm hoping some more people who think blue will talk so I can hear other opinions besides Solidify.
Mike said:Your problem is you compare everything with the biggest forums possible. HF is the biggest MyBB forum around.
Yellow is every forums route.
Justin said:Rules ARE ment to be broken. If rules weren't supposed to be broken, then what do Moderators do?
Basically it's like this,
No rules = No Cops = No Protection = A @"Crysis"
See what i did thar?
Miss Hannah Minx said:Definitely yellow.
It's our job to get the rule breakers.
Solidify said:That's ridiculous. It's not even justifying why with a response.
Again, it's sad that not everyone speaks up;
Miss Hannah Minx said:Solidify said:That's ridiculous. It's not even justifying why with a response.
Again, it's sad that not everyone speaks up;
Some people don't have the time to sit here and write novels like you.
Solidify said:Surely if they vote, they can leave a comment. Only takes a minute or two to reply.
Write novels? You're right, some members would much rather spam comments during contests. That's much less time consuming.
Miss Hannah Minx said:Solidify said:Surely if they vote, they can leave a comment. Only takes a minute or two to reply.
Write novels? You're right, some members would much rather spam comments during contests. That's much less time consuming.
It all goes down IF they want to comment.
If some of us moderators would actually do OUR job, then we wouldn't have to worry about that, now would we?
Solidify said:Miss Hannah Minx said:Solidify said:Surely if they vote, they can leave a comment. Only takes a minute or two to reply.
Write novels? You're right, some members would much rather spam comments during contests. That's much less time consuming.
It all goes down IF they want to comment.
If some of us moderators would actually do OUR job, then we wouldn't have to worry about that, now would we?
What do you mean by 'It all goes down IF they want to comment'?
And you're missing the point. If I put more backbone into doing my job, sure, I'd regulate the lobby better but wouldn't it be easier to address the issue at it's roots?
Miss Hannah Minx said:Solidify said:Miss Hannah Minx said:It all goes down IF they want to comment.
If some of us moderators would actually do OUR job, then we wouldn't have to worry about that, now would we?
What do you mean by 'It all goes down IF they want to comment'?
And you're missing the point. If I put more backbone into doing my job, sure, I'd regulate the lobby better but wouldn't it be easier to address the issue at it's roots?
I think I get what you're trying to say.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?