Read please.

Chill

Chill

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Posts
12,388
Reacts
15
Reputation
0
Credits
168
Seriously moderators need to know what they are doing.

How can you be a Moderator and be so stupid at what you do.
Please dont hate, I really think this needs to be fixed. You dont PM a mod with proof. You simply post it on your desired thread and thats it.
None of this "I will re-open this once you PM me proof".
If they ignore you and dont post proof, just close it. If they post proof after being asked. Thats all there is to do.
Proof cannot be vouched by anyone no matter who you are. Unless your the actual owner of what you are trying to sell. Please dont vouch proof if you have only seen pictures.

Im not picking on anyone in particular because i know myself, im not perfect.
If you want the forum or section you are running to go smooth. Fix your act.

Im looking out for the best interests of FK. I want this to be the best Forum for whats available here.

Cheers, Dam
 
I dont believe mods can close threads unless they are a certain mod of that section.

I dont know who mods the marketplace, but I agree they dont react fast enough and appropriately.

But on the contrary, PM'ing proof to a mod is fine. I understand if you dont want to post it in the thread in case MS is lurking here. After they PM the proof, the mod should post " Vouch, the user has sent me legit proof "

alison-brie-bukkake.gif
 
Good thread. I know exactly WHO you are talking about too. I mean if you're going to be a Mod, at least know the damn rules.
 
Im never mentioning staff, They do a great job.

its just people who run certain areas of the forum who need to look at this.
 
Alittle off topic but I think all Mods / staff and admins should be required to post proof. I dont care if its fucking Philly. If we need to post proof, they need to also.

I see all of christys threads with no proof. I dont care if she has like 400 things posted. The bitch got to post proof.
 
Poop said:
Alittle off topic but I think all Mods / staff and admins should be required to post proof. I dont care if its fucking Philly. If we need to post proof, they need to also.

I see all of christys threads with no proof. I dont care if she has like 400 things posted. The bitch got to post proof.
Click to expand...

Nigga I already gave Christy a warning yesterday for no proof.
I told her she has 24 hours to post proof or I'm closing her shit.
 
Cole said:
Nigga I already gave Christy a warning yesterday for no proof.
I told her she has 24 hours to post proof or I'm closing her shit.
Click to expand...

I did the same shit! I be like bitch listen, post proof or im giving you a time out.

She didnt and the bitch got what was handed to her.

She will listen next time.
 
I agree, But i mean if it gets to the point where admins are corrupt. Why bother about the Forum then?

Staff, Moderators, Upgraded members and Newbs should post proof. It should be an update in the Thread making option.
They should make it mandatory to post proof in a thread or you wont be able to make one.
 
ⅅα₥ said:
I agree, But i mean if it gets to the point where admins are corrupt. Why bother about the Forum then?

Staff, Moderators, Upgraded members and Newbs should post proof. It should be an update in the Thread making option.
They should make it mandatory to post proof in a thread or you wont be able to make one.
Click to expand...

A update wouldnt do anything. If you mean like they cant post a thread without including a pic, kids would just post this pic if they are selling the tag " Huggies '

11958-01_LM-Sz3-J_LEAP-422B(large)_primaryImage.jpg
 
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: R

Are you guys talking about Bowser? i want to say everyone is a good staff member, but I wouldn't be speaking my opinion if I did. w/e, and OT: some members don't even have sufficient post count to PM yet the thread is still closed and is asked for proof via pm
 
RE: R

PerPleX said:
Are you guys talking about Bowser? i want to say everyone is a good staff member, but I wouldn't be speaking my opinion if I did. w/e, and OT: some members don't even have sufficient post count to PM yet the thread is still closed and is asked for proof via pm
Click to expand...

Proof is wanted in the OP. If its posted in the OP it will not be needed via PM
 
RE: R

ⅅα₥ said:
Proof is wanted in the OP. If its posted in the OP it will not be needed via PM
Click to expand...

A new guy joins he has 1 post and he didnt post proof in the op
A mod closes the thread and asks for proof via PM

He has 1 post, how is he supposed to PM? He need 25..

i think the mod should just give him a day or two to post proof, they all seem pretty active so if they are good moderators i feel that would definitely work better than the whole 'pm' thing
 
RE: R

PerPleX said:
A new guy joins he has 1 post and he didnt post proof in the op
A mod closes the thread and asks for proof via PM

He has 1 post, how is he supposed to PM? He need 25..

i think the mod should just give him a day or two to post proof, they all seem pretty active so if they are good moderators i feel that would definitely work better than the whole 'pm' thing
Click to expand...

Thats right, You didnt understand still what i said. Proof should always be shown in the thread. New people or anyone is asked to do so. PM's are stupid. As everyone is saying lately. Everyone that is high profile are scamming. Who is to say a mod wont. (Not saying they will)
 
I Will like to see vouch's too forget the proof vouch is good for me.
 
#DamForCrusadeLeaderAgainstDumbModerators2012

Nuff said biyatches.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Featured

• General Discussion
• Inactive FK Username Requests

Share this page

Back
Top