New award.

@TheHackerHD Should deserve this award he's high quality and a respectable man and great business man :)
 
@TheHackerHD @Bit @Paradoxium @Sector @Leader @Yeti @Beats @Narc

I nominate these users for this award.
 
@Leader @Sector deserve this award. Sick award by the way!
 
Going to give @Leader @Narc and @Sector this right now.


@Ecstasy I highly doubt i will ever give @BasedGod this award, he harasses users's a lot...
 
*accept in that sense. But anyway @ecstasy I wouldnt want it. So far he has just given it to the repwhores and ass kissers around here. Rep and being known doesn't mean shit about quality.
 
@Leader , @Pun , @Doug , @TheHackerHD all HQ in my opinion.
 
Ecstasy said:
I think I am HQ, and have tons of vouchers, but I am not going to put myself in there because that is rude. I would say @Yeti, @FeaR, @Plague, or @BasedGod

These are my choices.

Yeah I wouldn't wan't this as well. No offense to Bradley but I rather accept the award from someone who has been on site for a while etc. Good luck to everyone who receives the award.

Thanks for Mentioning me @Ecstasy
 
@Plague I am from the UK therefor i would use the correct grammar in my country so it is except, i may revoke the award, i know that @Sector in my opinion is not a rep whore or a 'ass kisser' but yes i will revoke the award from @Narc and @Leader if i need to. So far people have posted on this thread just saying their friends or them self's, those three people were the most chosen user's that were not just 'user's friends'. I am going to speak to a few members that i think are pretty high quality (will be giving them the award) and see exactly who i should give/revoke the award from, thanks for the feedback.
 
Sorry I didn't know that, guess I learnt something new, and I appreciate it. I would personally like to recommend @Lethal though. He is a very legit guy and never had a problem with him. Glad to see that you are keeping it all updated though.
 
@Plague I have been told that i should leave it up to the user's that care about this site, not the one's that pay to look high quality. Would you PM me please, i would like to discuss this with you as well.
 
Bradley said:
Going to give @Leader @Narc and @Sector this right now.


@Ecstasy I highly doubt i will ever give @BasedGod this award, he harasses users's a lot...



You're a retard. You're giving this to your friends and the rep whores and beggers who suck your dick. This is why awards like "Trusted" and "HQ" cannot be owned by average members, because being hq or trusted is an opinion, though Ik in this case it is HQ.



@Ecstasy gave his opinion on actual HQ people. There is no universal definition for HQ and not everyone will agree. But whatever, do it you want. However if I was you I'd change the award. Especially because @Bradley, you are not close to HQ
 
@BasedGod I know i'm not HQ, i have no friends on FK?
 
Awesome idea, kudos for not selling it, and kudos for only giving it to actual HQ people.

Plenty of people deserve this award, definitely nominate @narc @astro @bradley @porsche

I honestly don't really pay much attention to people on here so yeah don't be hating if I left your name out.
 
BasedGod said:
You're a retard. You're giving this to your friends and the rep whores and beggers who suck your dick. This is why awards like "Trusted" and "HQ" cannot be owned by average members, because being hq or trusted is an opinion, though Ik in this case it is HQ.



@Ecstasy gave his opinion on actual HQ people. There is no universal definition for HQ and not everyone will agree. But whatever, do it you want. However if I was you I'd change the award. Especially because @Bradley, you are not close to HQ

Shots fired, bang bang. Thanks for removing the award. I didn't want it.
 
BasedGod said:
You're a retard. You're giving this to your friends and the rep whores and beggers who suck your dick. This is why awards like "Trusted" and "HQ" cannot be owned by average members, because being hq or trusted is an opinion, though Ik in this case it is HQ.



@Ecstasy gave his opinion on actual HQ people. There is no universal definition for HQ and not everyone will agree. But whatever, do it you want. However if I was you I'd change the award. Especially because @Bradley, you are not close to HQ

I'll weigh in with my opinion of "HQ". HQ is determined by a particular mindset, one of "This forum and it's best interests over my own", that means, to me, not intentionally doing anything that would otherwise harm the forum in any way shape or form. Or at least trying your very best to avoid doing do.

That is truly what being high quality is about. It's not about how many people like you, it's not about how many dicks you suck, it's not about how long and detailed your threads are your post count, none of that.
 
Bit said:
I'll weigh in with my opinion of "HQ". HQ is determined by a particular mindset, one of "This forum and it's best interests over my own", that means, to me, not intentionally doing anything that would otherwise harm the forum in any way shape or form. Or at least trying your very best to avoid doing do.

That is truly what being high quality is about. It's not about how many people like you, it's not about how many dicks you suck, it's not about how long and detailed your threads are your post count, none of that.

Okay that's cool bro.
Once again, not everyone well it agree with "HQ" so nobody gives a fuck no offense. Opinions vary.
 
Back
Top