MFW Kicked from Trap and Kawaii

Trap said:
It isn't impossible. But with the capping of members at a maximum of 8, the posting requirements, the profile requirements, it's abundantly hard to convince me to let just anyone right on in.



You can find the application & sub-forum requirements here: http://forumkorner.com/thread-181152.html



May i ask why you cap the members at 8? What if there are 9 insanely HQ members that meet all the requirements?
 
Twelve said:
May i ask why you cap the members at 8? What if there are 9 insanely HQ members that meet all the requirements?

Eight is a pretty solid number imo @Trap
 
Slay said:
Eight is a pretty solid number imo @Trap
So just because its a "solid" number?
Why not just find members who fit your criteria , no matter the number? I can already see that subforum being completely dead.
In the thread it looks like members are purely based off the pixels on their profile, not their post etiquette or personality.
 
Twelve said:
So just because its a "solid" number?

Why not just find members who fit your criteria , no matter the number? I can already see that subforum being completely dead.

Magic, Trap and I constantly talk in it lol, we have well over 1,000 posts and talk all the time. He just doesn't want 20 random people in his group, I wasn't speaking for him about the whole solid number.
 
Twelve said:
May i ask why you cap the members at 8? What if there are 9 insanely HQ members that meet all the requirements?
I put a lot of thinking into why I wouldn't want 6, 7, 9, & 10. For some reason when I added it all up, that number 8 worked for me.

(To save any confusion: I (myself) don't count towards the 8 members in the group.) So technically, there will be a maximum of 9 total members at any given time.

Once there are 10 members+, people stop posting in the sub-forum, about 1/4 of the users invited are not representing the group, etc.

I noticed when people are kicked from a group, they get very mad. I also noticed it took some users 5 whole days to realize they were kicked and send an angry message over ole' Trapples way. Because they lurked their "Misc" section & saw it wasn't in their list anymore. [Not that they ever even wore/represented it in the first place.]

I'm going to be revamping not only the name, image, etc. I am trying to change the way groups are thought of as a whole.

SWEET MAN, THAT'D BE A GREAT USERBAR TO ADD TO MY LIST! PLS LET ME IN, BRAH!?

I've accumulated 1,400 posts in the Trap Discussion thread and I've met some very nice people. But it was time for a change...
 
Slay said:
Magic, Trap and I constantly talk in it lol, we have well over 1,000 posts and talk all the time. He just doesn't want 20 random people in his group, I wasn't speaking for him about the whole solid number.
Ok thats 2 active members. If he doesn't want 20 random people, then he doesn't have to invite 20 random people?
Trap said:
I put a lot of thinking into why I wouldn't want 6, 7, 9, & 10. For some reason when I added it all up, that number 8 worked for me.

(To save any confusion: I (myself) don't count towards the 8 members in the group.) So technically, there will be a maximum of 9 total members at any given time.

Once there are 10 members+, people stop posting in the sub-forum, about 1/4 of the users invited are not representing the group, etc.

I noticed when people are kicked from a group, they get very mad. I also noticed it took some users 5 whole days to realize they were kicked and send an angry message over ole' Trapples way. Because they lurked their "Misc" section & saw it wasn't in their list anymore. [Not that they ever even wore/represented it in the first place.]

I'm going to be revamping not only the name, image, etc. I am trying to change the way groups are thought of as a whole.


I've accumulated 1,400 posts in the Trap Discussion thread and I've met some very nice people. But it was time for a change...

I understand what you are saying, but why put a number on it? Get a feel for what will work and will still keep the group exclusive, and who cares if someone gets mad? They weren't active, they get kicked. Thats how it should work.

And thats very ignorant to think that the number of members changes the activity. The only thing that can increase the activity is more members. If they aren't active kick them and find replacements. If you can't find anyone that fits the requirements, then

wait.
 
Twelve said:
Ok thats 2 active members. If he doesn't want 20 random people, then he doesn't have to invite 20 random people?

I understand what you are saying, but why put a number on it? Get a feel for what will work and will still keep the group exclusive, and who cares if someone gets mad? They weren't active, they get kicked. Thats how it should work.

And thats very ignorant to think that the number of members changes the activity. The only thing that can increase the activity is more members. If they aren't active kick them and find replacements. If you can't find anyone that fits the requirements, then

wait.

But it's activity regardless of how many members talk in it, you can have 10 HQ members that post once a week for fun and are in the group because of the UB. In the end it's all up to him.
 
Twelve said:
Ok thats 2 active members. If he doesn't want 20 random people, then he doesn't have to invite 20 random people?

I understand what you are saying, but why put a number on it? Get a feel for what will work and will still keep the group exclusive, and who cares if someone gets mad? They weren't active, they get kicked. Thats how it should work.

And thats very ignorant to think that the number of members changes the activity. The only thing that can increase the activity is more members. If they aren't active kick them and find replacements. If you can't find anyone that fits the requirements, then

wait.

Yeah, I get what you're saying. For right now there is a limit to how many people can be in the group at one time.
Will I be dead-set on 8 being the maximum? Probably not. But I won't be rushing to get all 8 members into this group.

I certainly won't be accepting buy-in's or bribes like I did in the past. I don't know what came over me.

Regardless, that was fairly insightful. I'll certainly keep what you said in mind.
 
Slay said:
But it's activity regardless of how many members talk in it, you can have 10 HQ members that post once a week for fun and are in the group because of the UB. In the end it's all up to him.
I don't understand. You want people to represent the group, yet you don't want them to like the UB?

Trap said:
Yeah, I get what you're saying. For right now there is a limit to how many people can be in the group at one time.
Will I be dead-set on 8 being the maximum? Probably not. But I won't be rushing to get all 8 members into this group.

I certainly won't be accepting buy-in's or bribes like I did in the past. I don't know what came over me.

Regardless, that was fairly insightful. I'll certainly keep what you said in mind.
I completely agree and respect you for that.
 
Slay said:
But it's activity regardless of how many members talk in it, you can have 10 HQ members that post once a week for fun and are in the group because of the UB. In the end it's all up to him.
Nah, in the end it's  a-l-l  a-b-o-u-t  t-h-e  f-u-c-k-i-n-g  u-s-e-r-b-a-r  with people... That's all anyone cares about, it seems.

You could be the most intellectual, outspoken, honest motherfucker in this room & you're still doing it for the userbar.

That is what I wish would change about this community. But it never will.
 
Twelve said:
I don't understand. You want people to represent the group, yet you don't want them to like the UB?

I completely agree and respect you for that.

You don't want them to ONLY like the UB is the point @Trap was getting across if you read the quote he made up.
 
Good idea, will definitely be a good, high quLity group. Unfortunately, this one group won't change all other groups (actually hope it will) and doesn't get rid of the excess groups on this forum. Best of luck dude and I'll be submitting my app once and if I hit the requirements.
 
Trap said:
Nah, in the end it's  a-l-l  a-b-o-u-t  t-h-e  f-u-c-k-i-n-g  u-s-e-r-b-a-r  with people... That's all anyone cares about, it seems.

You could be the most intellectual, outspoken, honest motherfucker in this room & you're still doing it for the userbar.

That is what I wish would change about this community. But it never will.

So its kind of just a game of how well you can hide it.
 
old said:
Good idea, will definitely be a good, high quLity group. Unfortunately, this one group won't change all other groups (actually hope it will) and doesn't get rid of the excess groups on this forum. Best of luck dude and I'll be submitting my app once and if I hit the requirements.
There is what, upwards to like 40 groups now? 5 or so that are so old and unused that they're no longer in the User Group section of the Control Panel?

So yeah, you're completely fucking right Vlad. I can only imagine the value per group if it was slaughtered down to 10-15 total user groups... Let's just say I'd be hitting the mall.


Twelve said:
So its kind of just a game of how well you can hide it.
Goddamn Jackpot!

Then when they see that their bullshit story got them accepted into the group:

oPCXhFV.jpg

THIS NIGGA BOUGHT IT!!! XD
 
Trap said:
I put a lot of thinking into why I wouldn't want 6, 7, 9, & 10. For some reason when I added it all up, that number 8 worked for me.

(To save any confusion: I (myself) don't count towards the 8 members in the group.) So technically, there will be a maximum of 9 total members at any given time.

Once there are 10 members+, people stop posting in the sub-forum, about 1/4 of the users invited are not representing the group, etc.

I noticed when people are kicked from a group, they get very mad. I also noticed it took some users 5 whole days to realize they were kicked and send an angry message over ole' Trapples way. Because they lurked their "Misc" section & saw it wasn't in their list anymore. [Not that they ever even wore/represented it in the first place.]

I'm going to be revamping not only the name, image, etc. I am trying to change the way groups are thought of as a whole.


I've accumulated 1,400 posts in the Trap Discussion thread and I've met some very nice people. But it was time for a change...

Fam if that 5 Whole Day thing was directed at me than you cray cray, cause I recently switched out of the Trap UB for the Monster one. I wore Trap most because I liked it and I never really wore the Kawaii one excluding the day I joined. I liked the community in Trap even if it was a bit small. I look forward to applying for your new group when / if I reach the requirements. GL :)
 
Back
Top