JaGeX vs. Impsoft

Shockwave said:
This.
They have tried twice and failed twice. This third case is pretty much the same as the first two.
No, this is totally different case. This has to do with privacy violation with the emails.
[/quote]

But I believe Jagex are also suing for damages if I'm not mistaken, I could be though.
 
Sir Vant said:
Shockwave said:
This.
They have tried twice and failed twice. This third case is pretty much the same as the first two.
No, this is totally different case. This has to do with privacy violation with the emails.

But I believe Jagex are also suing for damages if I'm not mistaken, I could be though.
[/quote]

Yeah, but the picture in OP's post has to deal with them taking action against the issue with the emails.
 
Shockwave said:
This.
They have tried twice and failed twice. This third case is pretty much the same as the first two.
No, this is totally different case. This has to do with privacy violation with the emails.
[/quote]

I said that they could possibly get them for that, but that is going be hard argue based on the fact they had a legal subpoena for the information. I'll be shocked here if PayPal isn't brought in here.
 
Zach said:
Shockwave said:
This.
They have tried twice and failed twice. This third case is pretty much the same as the first two.
No, this is totally different case. This has to do with privacy violation with the emails.

I said that they could possibly get them for that, but that is going be hard argue based on the fact they had a legal supenda for the information. I'll be shocked here if PayPal isn't brought in here.
[/quote]

Yeah, I really don't have any knowledge of any type of law. Paypal will for sure be brought into the case.
 
Shockwave said:
No, this is totally different case. This has to do with privacy violation with the emails.
I said that they could possibly get them for that, but that is going be hard argue based on the fact they had a legal supenda for the information. I'll be shocked here if PayPal isn't brought in here.
[/quote]

Yeah, I really don't have any knowledge of any type of law. Paypal will for sure be brought into the case.
[/quote]

To be honest, in regard to suing everyone individual that bots, this is possible but very not likely. Multiple individuals can be sued in a class action lawsuit. However, when you're talking about 200,000 people, I don't think they have the time to open thousands of class actions. We all know 200,000 people are not going to fit in one court room.

I'm sure their attorneys have made this clear to them that they are not doing this. The amount of manpower to be spent and the money that would be thrown away is outrageous. They wouldn't have one judge for all of the class actions either, meaning that they most likely wont win everyone of them.

It really comes down to the intention when you're discussing damaging business. I don't think there are many if at all botters that thought they were damaging the business. This lawsuit could fly with goldfarmers who have hundreds or thousands of accounts like myself, but not someone who just used an automated process to level. If they were to sue 200,000 people the court system would eventually tell them to fuck off. They have serious lawsuits to do and this just creates more backlog.

Also, a lot of people use fake information on PayPal. So the information PP has is incorrect, meaning more time and money spent on a lost cause. You cannot sue a nonexistent person.
 
Zach said:
Shockwave said:
No, this is totally different case. This has to do with privacy violation with the emails.
I
Also, a lot of people use fake information on PayPal. So the information PP has is incorrect, meaning more time and money spent on a lost cause. "You cannot sue a nonexistent person."
Challenge Accepted
 
All my bets are still on JaGex, and it hasn't been proven JaGex used illegal methods to circumvent laws about privacy. They may have actually gotten proper legal permission to get that information, they are not held accountable to release they received that information to the bot companies, nor the lawyers of the bot companies. I know JaGex employs much more talented lawyers then bot companies and that would seem like to much of a rookie mistake for them to make. By the way, there is a huge different in obtaining information in a deceitful way compared to an illegal way. Just because it's deceitful doesn't make it illegal, it's lawyers jobs to look for loopholes like that.
 
human886 said:
I
Also, a lot of people use fake information on PayPal. So the information PP has is incorrect, meaning more time and money spent on a lost cause. "You cannot sue a nonexistent person."
Challenge Accepted

[/quote]

Oh you..

Made my night :L
 
Back
Top