If sex images can be banned for youths, so can violence

[bhenjenz]

Legal definitions and prosecutions for obscene materials in the United States always have been directed at depictions of sexual conduct. Violence has never been part of that definition, and the Supreme Court continues in its belief that depictions of sex are harmful, but depictions of violence are not.. A significant social concern arises when sex is depicted in a way that involves force against an unwilling victim, against children, or even when unjustified violence without sex is depicted. A similar case can be made for depictions of violence resulting from hate, due to race, ethnicity or sexual orientation.

 

[ariely]

u can put restrictions or try to put sex away.
But if u are a kid have a pc and got internet u can find whatever u want, violence is the same thing u can cover it up and say it's bad, but some way or a other the kid will expierince violence.
And racisme against race/sexuality etc. will stay forever becouse some people can't accept the fact that some people are completly diffrent then they are so they choise not to understand it and what u dont understand is what u mostly shut out of your life.

 

[inamnilawar]

no i don't think so they should not banned i think you are trying to avoid sex and it could not be possible also

 

[CraptacularxD]

In my opinion, as long sex isn't banned for the youth, well violence cannot be banned also. Since Sex is much more immoral (some others say) than violence. Since Violence is just a cause of misunderstanding. Violence is also sometimes used as Self-Defense. So why ban violence if it has utility?

 

[armarasrar1]

Well i think the violence is more dangerous so that it leads to some time war and i think the superior should take some actions to minimize the violence as well