-
Welcome to ForumKorner!
Buy, Sell, Trade, Discuss—All in One Place.
I was right
- Thread starter RAF
- Start date
Facebook is stupid.
I've no use for it.
I only log like once every week to see people's birthday.
I've no use for it.
I only log like once every week to see people's birthday.
This turned into a huge shit storm, everyone has their own opinions on anything, you can't 100% predict the rise and drop of stocks, it's basically a hypothesis with a bit of background to it. You could all be right or you could all be wrong. Arguing is different than debating.
Famous™ said:
Meh I agree and disagree, Facebook doesn't have that much potential left, I mean what else could they do to upgrade their site?
Chewbaka said:
Yeah that's true, whole point of being a innovator is thinking of things no one has been able to implement.
My turn..
Your views need to be reshaped, not the community.
First of all, you posted an argument. You said it yourself. You're naturally provoking members right "off the bat".
Secondly, you're first reply, which has ultimately seemed to have lead to half the negativity in this thread, is about insulting your own staff member all because you choose to interpret his post in a hostile way. His intentions were good. If he said that to me, sure I can see how someone may take that in an offensive way, but let's analyse it. The kid's English isn't exactly up to par (no offense bud) and he lacks the ability to foresee the consequences of certain posts. Calling you out as being dumb was just a crude way of saying that he disagrees, but hey, I agree with him.
You think because Facebook shares are dropping means the company is going under? My god, if that were true for every company we'd be in the stone age.
Facebook shares will fluctuate and even out, and the company itself will last for many years yet.
Thirdly, you lack neutrality.
All your posts seem biased, one sided. Not only that, but they come across as hostile.
And fourth, you threaten everyone here that you can ban them forever, but you choose not to. Why's that, out of the kindness of your heart?
You're the owner of this forum. No one that's part of management should threaten their own members. Period.
Another member stated his opinion and got banned because they were all 'spam', and were they? No, you just let anger cloud your judgement.
To be honest, I'm inclined to agree with this guy. He's not wrong.
You insulted your own staff member on the assumption that he knowingly insulted you in the first place.
The Elite said:
Your views need to be reshaped, not the community.
First of all, you posted an argument. You said it yourself. You're naturally provoking members right "off the bat".
Secondly, you're first reply, which has ultimately seemed to have lead to half the negativity in this thread, is about insulting your own staff member all because you choose to interpret his post in a hostile way. His intentions were good. If he said that to me, sure I can see how someone may take that in an offensive way, but let's analyse it. The kid's English isn't exactly up to par (no offense bud) and he lacks the ability to foresee the consequences of certain posts. Calling you out as being dumb was just a crude way of saying that he disagrees, but hey, I agree with him.
You think because Facebook shares are dropping means the company is going under? My god, if that were true for every company we'd be in the stone age.
Facebook shares will fluctuate and even out, and the company itself will last for many years yet.
Thirdly, you lack neutrality.
All your posts seem biased, one sided. Not only that, but they come across as hostile.
And fourth, you threaten everyone here that you can ban them forever, but you choose not to. Why's that, out of the kindness of your heart?
You're the owner of this forum. No one that's part of management should threaten their own members. Period.
Another member stated his opinion and got banned because they were all 'spam', and were they? No, you just let anger cloud your judgement.
EzG said:
To be honest, I'm inclined to agree with this guy. He's not wrong.
You think you've done nothing wrong.The Elite said:
You insulted your own staff member on the assumption that he knowingly insulted you in the first place.
My turn..
First of all, you posted an argument. You said it yourself. You're naturally provoking members right "off the bat".
Secondly, you're first reply, which ultimately has seemed to have lead to half the negativity in this thread, is about insulting your own staff member all because you choose to interpret his post in a hostile way. His intentions were good. If he said that to me, sure I can see how someone may take that in an offensive way, but let's analyse it. His English isn't exactly up to par (no offense bud) and he lacks the ability to foresee the consequences of certain posts. Calling you out as being dumb was just a crude way of saying that he disagrees, but hey, I agree with him.
You think because Facebook shares are dropping means the company is going under? My god, if that were true for every company we'd be in the stone age.
Facebook shares will fluctuate and even out, and the company itself will last for many, many years yet.
Thirdly, you lack neutrality.
All your posts seem biased, one sided. Not only that, but they come across as hostile.
And fourth, you threaten everyone here that you can ban them forever, but you choose not to. Why's that, out of the kindness of your heart?
You're the owner of this forum. No one that's part of management should threaten their own members. Period.
Another member stated his opinion and got banned because they were all 'spam' and 'low quality', and were they? No, you just let anger cloud your judgement.
To be honest, I'm inclined to agree with this guy. He's not wrong.
You're main flaw here seems to be in the fact that you seem to believe that you're always right. You're not.
Let's have a look here..
Secondly, you state that you won't insult him yet the result of your next statement can be taken as an insult to his intelligence. Derp.
Next, your 'rational' reply was completely based on the assumption that your own staff member was intentionally trying to insult you. He wasn't. Not only that, but you then try to insult him be insisting that he doesn't have an understanding of the topic. This is flawed considering his post contains nothing that shows his lack of understanding. Lack of grammar perhaps, but not understanding. Not only that, he's not wrong. As I've previously stated, a drop in shares doesn't mean the end of the biggest social networking site in history.
Your next post, well, it doesn't exactly come across as friendly.
To top it off, the post behind the quote is an opinion.
Put simply, he's not wrong.
Where did he 'lack processing in his logic'?
Considering I did it for him, mind throwing that EzG lad an unban?
There's a number of things more that could be added to the list, but that'll do. You get my point.
Perhaps the way you view things should be reshaped. The entire community isn't at fault here.
Leonard*
The Elite said:
First of all, you posted an argument. You said it yourself. You're naturally provoking members right "off the bat".
Secondly, you're first reply, which ultimately has seemed to have lead to half the negativity in this thread, is about insulting your own staff member all because you choose to interpret his post in a hostile way. His intentions were good. If he said that to me, sure I can see how someone may take that in an offensive way, but let's analyse it. His English isn't exactly up to par (no offense bud) and he lacks the ability to foresee the consequences of certain posts. Calling you out as being dumb was just a crude way of saying that he disagrees, but hey, I agree with him.
You think because Facebook shares are dropping means the company is going under? My god, if that were true for every company we'd be in the stone age.
Facebook shares will fluctuate and even out, and the company itself will last for many, many years yet.
Thirdly, you lack neutrality.
All your posts seem biased, one sided. Not only that, but they come across as hostile.
And fourth, you threaten everyone here that you can ban them forever, but you choose not to. Why's that, out of the kindness of your heart?
You're the owner of this forum. No one that's part of management should threaten their own members. Period.
Another member stated his opinion and got banned because they were all 'spam' and 'low quality', and were they? No, you just let anger cloud your judgement.
EzG said:
To be honest, I'm inclined to agree with this guy. He's not wrong.
You think you've done nothing wrong.The Elite said:
You're main flaw here seems to be in the fact that you seem to believe that you're always right. You're not.
Let's have a look here..
The very first sentence in this post is wrong. Why must you insist on pointing out that you want to insult your own admin? It's not necessary and its childish.The Elite said:I'm going to:
1. Go off the bat and not insult you, even though I really want to.
2. Show you where you lacked processing logic in this post.
The Elite said:
He called me dumb, completely rational reply.
The Elite said:Lol, don't make me laugh. You act as if you're an economics expert, when it's clear you lack knowledge as well, we all do. So don't attempt to patronise me. And umm, less than a week after going public their stocks drop, that's not a broken IPO, that's them being extremely overpriced and people realising that FB isn't as great as it used to be.
Nah, what's more shocking are your speculations that you think I expect stocks to continue rising forever, and FYI, shareholders expect stocks to rise, or they sell. L2eco. (I'm sorry though, that had to be in there.)
Called me a noob and patronised me, I'm sorry I said "L2eco" which I even mentioned was a joke.
The Elite said:
Secondly, you state that you won't insult him yet the result of your next statement can be taken as an insult to his intelligence. Derp.
Next, your 'rational' reply was completely based on the assumption that your own staff member was intentionally trying to insult you. He wasn't. Not only that, but you then try to insult him be insisting that he doesn't have an understanding of the topic. This is flawed considering his post contains nothing that shows his lack of understanding. Lack of grammar perhaps, but not understanding. Not only that, he's not wrong. As I've previously stated, a drop in shares doesn't mean the end of the biggest social networking site in history.
Your next post, well, it doesn't exactly come across as friendly.
To top it off, the post behind the quote is an opinion.
Whether it's right or wrong doesn't matter, yet you choose to turn it all into an argument.Chewbaka said:
Put simply, he's not wrong.
Where did he 'lack processing in his logic'?
You're practically calling them both dumb, proving Chewy right, and you wrong. Not that there is a right or wrong. It's an opinion.
Considering I did it for him, mind throwing that EzG lad an unban?
There's a number of things more that could be added to the list, but that'll do. You get my point.
The Elite said:
Perhaps the way you view things should be reshaped. The entire community isn't at fault here.
The Elite said:
Leonard*
I get it, It's the year 2012 after all.. New World Order coming at ya.
/jokes
/jokes
Im not a economy expert but yeah facebook has reached/pass his peak and its only a matter of time before a new type of social networking comes along and kills fb plus you must be a retarded to buy shares in a business like facebook anyway
Good hope it dies because its only for girls who dont open there legs and wanna spam you wall all day with farming shit
Good hope it dies because its only for girls who dont open there legs and wanna spam you wall all day with farming shit
Now that Facebook is being scrutinised by its new-found shareholders, it really needs people to start clicking on its ads.
That's a fact shamelessly highlighted by Mark Zuckerberg's right-hand woman, chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg, who was speaking to business students at Harvard University this morning.
According to Reuters, she finished off her speech by saying: "We're public now, so could you please click on an ad or two while you're there."
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/24/sheryl_sandberg_facebook_exec/
l0l
That's a fact shamelessly highlighted by Mark Zuckerberg's right-hand woman, chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg, who was speaking to business students at Harvard University this morning.
According to Reuters, she finished off her speech by saying: "We're public now, so could you please click on an ad or two while you're there."
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/24/sheryl_sandberg_facebook_exec/
l0l
Chewbaka said:
Well yeah thats the obvious, but I don't see another social networking site becoming close to it, others may become big but nothing can compare to it.
It's not just a social networking site, almost all business's are connected to facebook, they have the fan pages which promotes and can run their business.
It's also for all ages, and there isn't really another site like that.
