How Detectable is Color Botting?

Godlike said:
Well yeah, Simba isn't as simple as clicking download and run, but I like it the way it is since it's not spoon feeding people.

I don't play either, I just enjoy scripting. It's a nice break from my OOP job.

If they have the creator of RsBuddy on their team, Sure they'll find a easy way to get it gone. Lmfao, I'm right..

[/quote]

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
 
The Agonist said:
I have a feeling someone is making multiple accounts..

But yea I'd really like to see a logical explanation and not " I got banned using it years ago" or " I haven't been banned in a month"



I think the reason you're getting new member posting, like myself, is because Daniel posted the link to this thread in IRC. I'm just here trying to give the truth about Simba.

What else would you like to see? Did the section I link you to help at all? I'd really like to help people use Simba to auto, but you're going to have to trust us when we say the ban rate is very low.

I can say, without a doubt, that Simba's ban rate is much lower than any of the java bots.
 
Kyle Undefined said:
I think the reason you're getting new member posting, like myself, is because Daniel posted the link to this thread in IRC. I'm just here trying to give the truth about Simba.

What else would you like to see? Did the section I link you to help at all? I'd really like to help people use Simba to auto, but you're going to have to trust us when we say the ban rate is very low.

I can say, without a doubt, that Simba's ban rate is much lower than any of the java bots.
WHY is it less detectable? Answer that and you got me
 
The Agonist said:
WHY is it less detectable? Answer that and you got me

Because the scripters take great care in creating scripts. We use methods that a human would to find or to do things. Randomization is applied to everything that's major (ie mouse movements, clicks, waits, etc).

I'm not saying we're perfect, because no bot is, it all depends on the scripters.
 
Kyle Undefined said:
Because the scripters take great care in creating scripts. We use methods that a human would to find or to do things. Randomization is applied to everything that's major (ie mouse movements, clicks, waits, etc).

I'm not saying we're perfect, because no bot is, it all depends on the scripters.
Not the scripters, but color botting in general. My bad
 
The Agonist said:
Not the scripters, but color botting in general. My bad

Like I said, the reason why Simba is less detectable is because of the scripters. Without us, Simba would be a program that would do nothing (Well, not actually nothing, but it wouldn't do anything for RS). The SRL Include is what powers the scripters to do many things.
 
Kyle Undefined said:
Like I said, the reason why Simba is less detectable is because of the scripters. Without us, Simba would be a program that would do nothing (Well, not actually nothing, but it wouldn't do anything for RS). The SRL Include is what powers the scripters to do many things.
I'm not talking bout simba I'm talking about all color bots
 
I'm only discussing Simba, since that's the only free color bot that's out there at the moment. I thought we were talking about the same thing, sorry for the assumption.
 
The Agonist said:
I'm not talking bout simba I'm talking about all color bots

Why would he be protecting any program other than Simba?

I don't understand why you guys are thinking that Simba is 'sooo' detectable, since when does anyone listen to the propaganda Jagex says about bots? Obviously it wasn't the easiest to get rid of, as it's been there much longer than rsbuddy or powerbot or whatever and it's still standing regardless about what Jagex said. Who cares if they have a reflection bot-maker working for them?

Why isn't it detectable? Well, for starters there's no editing of the client whatsoever. Plus there was a lot less random-ness in most javabot scripts as far as I could tell, I noticed they tended to click on the same or close to exact same tile every time and similar spots on objects (obviously it could be randomized and made better by scripters in Java bots, same goes for Simba).

There's no valid reason as to why the color scripts at SRL would be more detectable except for maybe random solving, which it just logs out for if it can't solve it anyways. If you're that worried use scripts created by SRL members+ as they have all had to prove they can make a properly functioning script.
 
Carbon said:
If they have the creator of RsBuddy on their team, Sure they'll find a easy way to get it gone. Lmfao, I'm right..

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.


[/quote]

Honestly, I just been inactive and I just knew what I'm talking about.
Suprising right?
 
iron man said:
Why would he be protecting any program other than Simba?

I don't understand why you guys are thinking that Simba is 'sooo' detectable, since when does anyone listen to the propaganda Jagex says about bots? Obviously it wasn't the easiest to get rid of, as it's been there much longer than rsbuddy or powerbot or whatever and it's still standing regardless about what Jagex said. Who cares if they have a reflection bot-maker working for them?

Why isn't it detectable? Well, for starters there's no editing of the client whatsoever. Plus there was a lot less random-ness in most javabot scripts as far as I could tell, I noticed they tended to click on the same or close to exact same tile every time and similar spots on objects (obviously it could be randomized and made better by scripters in Java bots, same goes for Simba).

There's no valid reason as to why the color scripts at SRL would be more detectable except for maybe random solving, which it just logs out for if it can't solve it anyways. If you're that worried use scripts created by SRL members+ as they have all had to prove they can make a properly functioning script.
Because simba is a color bot.. Which is what I asked about..

Your paragraph tho was pretty much what I was asking for haha


Kyle Undefined said:
I'm only discussing Simba, since that's the only free color bot that's out there at the moment. I thought we were talking about the same thing, sorry for the assumption.
No worries, just a misunderstanding
 
There is really no argument to be made about a general detectability of color bots, if there is something for Jagex to "detect" it's in the loader, which have been safe for quite a while... With a color bot, any judgement of whether or not it's a program playing is to be made from the behavior, which generally doesn't differ all that much from that of a reflection bot. There is no common factor to all color bots ever made that'd make them collectively detected or undetected, like Kyle said it's in the scripts...
 
colorbots are terrible cuz they never work as of the new color updates.

~Ven0m
 
Ven0m said:
colorbots are terrible cuz they never work as of the new color updates.

~Ven0m

Well, that's all there is to use now. Reflection/Injection is dead, so color it is. Also, a lot of scripts over at Simba work even after an update, since we use tolerance for the colors.

Also, the RuneDream bot you're trying to run is also color, and much less advanced than Simba/Scar at the moment ;)
 
RuneDream is still in it's early stages yet, but it does have potential.
 
Zex said:
RuneDream is still in it's early stages yet, but it does have potential.

Yes, I actually want to see how they develop in the coming months. Would give me the push to learn another programming language.
 
Probably won't get banned. Still bots like powerbot and rid are sooo much better.
 
Back
Top