I don't get it. Would you mind explaining?Dunk said:Kinda reminds me of:
But i still like it. ;P![]()
That was me haha, I'm One! Thank you as well!Color said:It's alright, but a bit boring to be honest. It just looks a bit too simple for my taste. I preferred One's logo he'd made a while back to this though. (I forgot his new name, he's still active, so hopefully he'll correct me.)
I agree with your original point, however I think it would be correct to say that it is recommended that Adobe Illustrator is used, as oppose to it being a necessity. Many people find it easier to produce logos in Photoshop, as they are more experienced in said program than Illustrator. The only downside to using Photoshop for logo creation is the lack of image quality presented by an image which is not a vector. The basic fact that Illustrator is the better program for constructing a logo is a falsity, as the same results can be achieved using either program, however each program enables a task to be completed in either an easier or a harder fashion.Hyakudou said:It looks decent, but the style is a little bit over-used if you ask me. However, the text layers are pretty good, another thing.. This is most likely created in Adobe Photoshop, but logos should always be created in Adobe Illustrator.
Noise said:I agree with your original point, however I think it would be correct to say that it is recommended that Adobe Illustrator is used, as oppose to it being a necessity. Many people find it easier to produce logos in Photoshop, as they are more experienced in said program than Illustrator. The only downside to using Photoshop for logo creation is the lack of image quality presented by an image which is not a vector. The basic fact that Illustrator is the better program for constructing a logo is a falsity, as the same results can be achieved using either program, however each program enables a task to be completed in either an easier or a harder fashion.
I understand that, I was merely commenting on your statement as I found it to be untrue in certain respects. I use both programs and do agree with you on this point, however I find the elitist approach taken by many people on the subject to be rather annoying. Regardless, nice chat haha!Hyakudou said:Then again, I never said it was needed to create a logo in Illustrator, nor did I say or imply that a logo had/have to be made in Adobe Illustrator. I said the following;
This is most likely created in Adobe Photoshop, but logos should always be created in Adobe Illustrator.
I said that logos should always be created in Adobe Illustrator, as Illustrator uses Vector Technology, while Photoshop uses Pixel Technology. Seeing how a logo in normally used for different things and sizes, it would be wisest to create it as an vector. Though its no requirement, as you explained. The same result can be achieved in Photoshop, GiMP or perhaps other programs as well.
Noise said:I understand that, I was merely commenting on your statement as I found it to be untrue in certain respects. I use both programs and do agree with you on this point, however I find the elitist approach taken by many people on the subject to be rather annoying. Regardless, nice chat haha!