deathcrow said:Haha, nice. But I wouldn't recommend changing icons and that other stuff. Makes it more detectable even when encrypted. If it was FUD before, doing that stuff would probably make it, for example, detect 3/33 instead of 0/33.
Thunderlane said:deathcrow said:Haha, nice. But I wouldn't recommend changing icons and that other stuff. Makes it more detectable even when encrypted. If it was FUD before, doing that stuff would probably make it, for example, detect 3/33 instead of 0/33.
aah, thank you.
See, I'm still learning. I don't understand most things.
I still need to fine the definitions of FUD and them "detect 0/33" etc.
thanks though !
rambo v2 said:Thunderlane said:deathcrow said:Haha, nice. But I wouldn't recommend changing icons and that other stuff. Makes it more detectable even when encrypted. If it was FUD before, doing that stuff would probably make it, for example, detect 3/33 instead of 0/33.
aah, thank you.
See, I'm still learning. I don't understand most things.
I still need to fine the definitions of FUD and them "detect 0/33" etc.
thanks though !
He means that changing the icon if it was already created so that it was mostly undetectable, changing the icon can mess with it and give a 3/33 reading for a virus scan instead of the FUD options making it 0/33.
Thunderlane said:rambo v2 said:Thunderlane said:aah, thank you.
See, I'm still learning. I don't understand most things.
I still need to fine the definitions of FUD and them "detect 0/33" etc.
thanks though !
He means that changing the icon if it was already created so that it was mostly undetectable, changing the icon can mess with it and give a 3/33 reading for a virus scan instead of the FUD options making it 0/33.
I see, thank you!
Much appreciated
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?