How am I suppose to respond to this? Holy shit. I'm totally speechless as I type this. I got you so mad and butt-hurt you had to make a thread attempting to "expose" me? Holy fucking shit. This is top tier cringe.
1.) I never said I disagreed with the position that desire is marker of sexual orientation. I made this point in my thread several times, you fucking dumbass.
"You can identify as straight and be sexually attracted to the same sex or whatever. My point is that in fluidity, we are essentially bisexuals since it's a mix."
"Yeah, you can suck and fuck as many dudes as you and identify as straight. This is part of fluidity. Your gender identity is determined by you."
2.) I never disagreed with the notion that we determine our sexuality, you dumb motherfucker. I made this point several times in my thread as well. Refer to the above.
3.) A scientific theory is not the same as a conventional theory. A scientific theory has plenty of evidence supporting its claims. Gravity is a theory. Evolution is a theory. Sexual fluidity isn't some baseless concept. We know it's a thing. Your source even acknowledges its existence. Read up, dumbcunt.
3a.) Are you even reading what you're quoting? That quote says we don't understand why women are more sexually fluid than men. How does this attack my argument at all? You don't even know what you're saying. You're so fucking dumb.
3b.) Holy shit, dude. How did you type this shit and not say to yourself, "Wait, this quote doesn't have any correlation to what I'm typing."? That quotes says we don't completely understand what drives sexual fluidity. It doesn't say we know sexuality isn't influenced by environmental factors or that there isn't evidence for that or whatever you think it said. We know sexuality is malleable and is influenced by environmental factors. Go to any American prison. Tons of men who identify as straight men are fucking other men who identify as straight. And people who are sexually abused are more likely to identify as homosexual. These are some extreme examples but we know we act different sexually when we're given certain environmental circumstances. Some which are subtle and basically inevitable.
4.) You called me a bigot on my thread and negrepped me for being a bigot before I wrote any of that, you stupid fucking moron. How can't you understand this? I've been asking you to show me how I was a bigot before you antagonized and insulted me. Get this through your tiny little brain and show me already.
I mean it's not hard to understand. You don't have to start sucking dick or start calling yourself gay to accept my position to be right. All you have to do is recognize since we can't really be 100% straight or homosexual due to sexual fluidity and unavoidable environmental factors, we're essentially all bisexuals in the traditional sense of the word because it's a mixture. The traditional sense of the word being liking both girls and boys, and that mixture can be 99.99% women and 00.01% men, or like me, 97% women and 3% men. This isn't hard to grasp. I bet you would be agreeing with me if you weren't insecure with your sexuality.
And props to you for misrepresenting me every way imaginable. It's impressive how wrong you are. You and anyone who upvoted this thread should be feeling dumb as fuck right now. "He called Cannibal out, quoted some person, used big boy thesaurus words, and his thread is long so he must be right. Upvote." Lol. This was great.
