Personally I find all this to be pathetic. Just another reason for all these "activists" to get a so called "win" over the "racists". It's fucking sad how everyone views it as well.
The confederate flag was representing the South's unwillingness to conform to the requests of the north. Less than 80% of the confederate army was a slave owner, and quite a few were black.
You say the confederate flag is so racist because it was flown for 4 years over "slavery"? The American flag was flown for over 80 years over slavery, so by default it should be taken down as well.
In the height of the KKK there were 100x more American flags being flown by them than confederate flags.
The north depended on slavery just as much as the south did, also they owned slaves as well, so who is the racist here? The north just preferred to invest and profit off of the south.
Most of the slaves were actually treated quite well, if you owned something wouldn't you want to make sure it was taken care of and lasted as long as possible?
Black people were viewed as less than human, but that's because they were forced to be property, so people because accustomed to it.
There were also black slave owners, so all these "activists" should check the history books saying only the white people are racist.
All of this spurred because of the recent shooting, yet there were trees in some of his pictures, and houses. Should we destroy all of them as well? They were around when slavery was.
I hadn't seen any other thread regarding this, so figured I'd make one stating my opinion of it.
The confederate flag was representing the South's unwillingness to conform to the requests of the north. Less than 80% of the confederate army was a slave owner, and quite a few were black.
You say the confederate flag is so racist because it was flown for 4 years over "slavery"? The American flag was flown for over 80 years over slavery, so by default it should be taken down as well.
In the height of the KKK there were 100x more American flags being flown by them than confederate flags.
The north depended on slavery just as much as the south did, also they owned slaves as well, so who is the racist here? The north just preferred to invest and profit off of the south.
Most of the slaves were actually treated quite well, if you owned something wouldn't you want to make sure it was taken care of and lasted as long as possible?
Black people were viewed as less than human, but that's because they were forced to be property, so people because accustomed to it.
There were also black slave owners, so all these "activists" should check the history books saying only the white people are racist.
All of this spurred because of the recent shooting, yet there were trees in some of his pictures, and houses. Should we destroy all of them as well? They were around when slavery was.
I hadn't seen any other thread regarding this, so figured I'd make one stating my opinion of it.