[ARCHIVED] We don't need more staff.

Assangha

Active Member
Reputation
0
Way over staffed. Thx.
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

Actually we're at the same point we were last night, everyone should be different though.

Also, if Paradoxos quits, nobody is taking his spot.
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

Reality said:
Actually we're at the same point we were last night, everyone should be different though.

Also, if Paradoxos quits, nobody is taking his spot.

We had to many people to begin with. Xypher and I were working on it when Mark became an admin and then we stopped, but yeah. Ratio should be 1 staff member per every 10 moderators. :3
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

Well Mute is really active so I decided he should be staff.

Silver comes on everyday and he's smart, so I gave him in place of Robbie.

Proof has always been staff.

Admins = Derp

Mods, You're mod, Mia's mod because NaDe quit, Paradoxos is quitting, and whoever else. Shinkirou is a good computing gui,
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

Reality said:
Well Mute is really active so I decided he should be staff.

Silver comes on everyday and he's smart, so I gave him in place of Robbie.

Proof has always been staff.

Admins = Derp

Mods, You're mod, Mia's mod because NaDe quit, Paradoxos is quitting, and whoever else. Shinkirou is a good computing gui,

Don't need to promote someone every time someone quits. I don't have a problem with them, but we don't have anything to moderate as it is. Makes the site look unprofessional when the only active members are moderators.

/2cents.
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

I agree with you there, but I gave it to active members who deserved it, and people who know about the section they mod.

There are more mods than staff.

Proof is inactive so there are really only 2 active staff members, and 3-4 mods.

Then me and mark are only active admins, if he's even active.
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

Well Staff should know at least a little bit about every board since they are are going to be handling them. I don't think some people are qualified, but thats just my opinion. Just not too thrilled about the timing.
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

When the forum gets diverse in it's posting I'll consider that ^^

Testing:

(C)
(R)
(TM)
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

Assangha said:
Well Staff should know at least a little bit about every board since they are are going to be handling them. I don't think some people are qualified, but thats just my opinion. Just not too thrilled about the timing.

I can handle graphics section still
Mia has programming
Shink with computing
You have anime

That's all the sections covered with minimum moderators. Silver and I can just ban/warn when necessary.

We're only lacking regular members :/
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

Wat?
1 staff member to every 10 moderators?
We need less moderators, because a moderator should be the most skilled out of most in their forum, and honestly there are very few people who are skilled in a lot of these forums.

Just my thought.
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

I might hide Security and Pen Testing until we have someone truly skilled in Malware Removal and Pen Testing become dedicated, ie Harvey; who is busy IRL currently.

I've got a ways to go with my training before I can run that section, too.

Para said he's quitting, so leaves nothing :p
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

Mark's not active?
wut
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

You were off for like 36 hours, then you didn't answer me on Skype, sorry for the opinion :roflmao:
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

I had to go see a school play dude.
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

Well you weren't demoted because I:
1.) Didn't want to
2.) Would've gotten banned if I did
3.) Would've gotten banned if I did
4.) Would've gotten banned if I did
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

Mia said:
Wat?
1 staff member to every 10 moderators?
We need less moderators, because a moderator should be the most skilled out of most in their forum, and honestly there are very few people who are skilled in a lot of these forums.

Just my thought.

They don't need to be the most skilled. They do need to know what they are talking about. Saying that, you aren't even qualified for your moderator position.
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

We'll see what happens.

I wanna see the new theme :hehe:
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

Mia said:
Wat?
1 staff member to every 10 moderators?
We need less moderators, because a moderator should be the most skilled out of most in their forum, and honestly there are very few people who are skilled in a lot of these forums.

Just my thought.

I'm definitely not the best GFX maker here, but I do a darn good job moderating the section.

You could be the best, but also have bad grammar, bad decision making skills, and you might not be active.

Of course it does help if you're a good programmer to mod the programmer section, so you at least know what you're talking about.

They don't need to be the most skilled. They do need to know what they are talking about. Saying that, you aren't even qualified for your moderator position.

Not necessarily.
 
RE: We don't need more staff.

/M/ said:
Mia said:
Wat?
1 staff member to every 10 moderators?
We need less moderators, because a moderator should be the most skilled out of most in their forum, and honestly there are very few people who are skilled in a lot of these forums.

Just my thought.

I'm definitely not the best GFX maker here, but I do a darn good job moderating the section.

You could be the best, but also have bad grammar, bad decision making skills, and you might not be active.

Of course it does help if you're a good programmer to mod the programmer section, so you at least know what you're talking about.

They don't need to be the most skilled. They do need to know what they are talking about. Saying that, you aren't even qualified for your moderator position.

Not necessarily.

What do you mean?
 
Back
Top