Am I being an idiot or what?

Gengar_mybb_import19743

Active Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Posts
1,106
Reacts
0
Reputation
0
Credits
0
Guys if it takes 10 hours for 12 men to build a wall it will take 20 hours for 6 men to right? This bitch is going off on me telling me I'm wrong l0l and like 3 other niggas saying I'm wrong.

Am I being a derp right now or what? I'm like 99.975488182% sure I'm right..
 
Putting the scenario aside; yes you are right. Adding in the scenario, many variables come into play.
 
RAF said:
One way to explain it is as @"Predator" said it.

If you have 6 men, you may have less steps taken, therefore increasing how much work is done.
If you have 3 men, you have more steps required, increasing time taken to work.

That's what I was referring to when I mentioned an exponential graph.
Click to expand...

I don't think the question was meant to be over thought like that but I get what you're saying. So I think I was right and she's just a dumb cunt.
 
RAF said:
More men can possibly increase the efficiency similar to that of an exponential graph. So you may be wrong or right.
Click to expand...

Or decrease efficiency. Too many men could hinder further progress.
 
I assume we're just adding variables/possibilities here and that like you stated, it most likely wasn't a question meant to be over thought. So yeah, you're probably right.
 
Storm said:
RAF said:
More men can possibly increase the efficiency similar to that of an exponential graph. So you may be wrong or right.
Click to expand...

Or decrease efficiency. Too many men could hinder further progress.
Click to expand...

Exactly, but nonetheless, you must consider it (from their point of view) just as an acceleration graph would be considered in regards to a velocity graph.

Gengar said:
RAF said:
One way to explain it is as @"Predator" said it.

If you have 6 men, you may have less steps taken, therefore increasing how much work is done.
If you have 3 men, you have more steps required, increasing time taken to work.

That's what I was referring to when I mentioned an exponential graph.
Click to expand...

I don't think the question was meant to be over thought like that but I get what you're saying. So I think I was right and she's just a dumb c*nt.
Click to expand...

Oh no don't get me wrong, the logical process for a trivial question would be definitely yours. I'm just attempting to alleviate your speculation by answering it from their POV.
 
RAF said:
Storm said:
RAF said:
More men can possibly increase the efficiency similar to that of an exponential graph. So you may be wrong or right.
Click to expand...

Or decrease efficiency. Too many men could hinder further progress.
Click to expand...

Exactly, but nonetheless, you must consider it (from their point of view) just as an acceleration graph would be considered in regards to a velocity graph.

Gengar said:
RAF said:
One way to explain it is as @"Predator" said it.

If you have 6 men, you may have less steps taken, therefore increasing how much work is done.
If you have 3 men, you have more steps required, increasing time taken to work.

That's what I was referring to when I mentioned an exponential graph.
Click to expand...

I don't think the question was meant to be over thought like that but I get what you're saying. So I think I was right and she's just a dumb c*nt.
Click to expand...

Oh no don't get me wrong, the logical process for a trivial question would be definitely yours. I'm just attempting to alleviate your speculation by answering it from their POV.
Click to expand...


Why must your replies seem so intelligent. :(
 
Predator said:
RAF said:
Storm said:
Or decrease efficiency. Too many men could hinder further progress.
Click to expand...

Exactly, but nonetheless, you must consider it (from their point of view) just as an acceleration graph would be considered in regards to a velocity graph.

Gengar said:
I don't think the question was meant to be over thought like that but I get what you're saying. So I think I was right and she's just a dumb c*nt.
Click to expand...

Oh no don't get me wrong, the logical process for a trivial question would be definitely yours. I'm just attempting to alleviate your speculation by answering it from their POV.
Click to expand...


Why must your replies seem so intelligent. :(
Click to expand...


TBH, it's a habit. I always write like an illiterate moron on Facebook and other websites since it's the socially accepted method, whereas I actually love writing with sophisticated vocabulary and sentence structure. It helps me in school as well which also makes it favourable for me. :D
 
Well it depends, what is the wall made out of?
 
Oh gawsh. I feel intelligent on Facebook considering I use proper grammar whereas majority of my "friends" *cough acquaintances* would prefer to "type lyk dis" compared to majority of the posts on Rune Gear where people actually make conversation that isn't completely retarded and use a wide range of vocabulary. It also occurs to me that you have a neat vocabulary list stored in that brain of yours :D
 
Could definitely be better? I'm not sure whether to feel retarded or just try and act intelligent ;) Also yeah, about 3-5 (rough estimate) of my friends on FB aren't 100% entirely retarded.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Featured

• General Discussion
• Inactive FK Username Requests

Share this page

Back
Top