RAF said:One way to explain it is as @"Predator" said it.
If you have 6 men, you may have less steps taken, therefore increasing how much work is done.
If you have 3 men, you have more steps required, increasing time taken to work.
That's what I was referring to when I mentioned an exponential graph.
RAF said:More men can possibly increase the efficiency similar to that of an exponential graph. So you may be wrong or right.
Storm said:RAF said:More men can possibly increase the efficiency similar to that of an exponential graph. So you may be wrong or right.
Or decrease efficiency. Too many men could hinder further progress.
Gengar said:RAF said:One way to explain it is as @"Predator" said it.
If you have 6 men, you may have less steps taken, therefore increasing how much work is done.
If you have 3 men, you have more steps required, increasing time taken to work.
That's what I was referring to when I mentioned an exponential graph.
I don't think the question was meant to be over thought like that but I get what you're saying. So I think I was right and she's just a dumb c*nt.
RAF said:Storm said:RAF said:More men can possibly increase the efficiency similar to that of an exponential graph. So you may be wrong or right.
Or decrease efficiency. Too many men could hinder further progress.
Exactly, but nonetheless, you must consider it (from their point of view) just as an acceleration graph would be considered in regards to a velocity graph.
Gengar said:RAF said:One way to explain it is as @"Predator" said it.
If you have 6 men, you may have less steps taken, therefore increasing how much work is done.
If you have 3 men, you have more steps required, increasing time taken to work.
That's what I was referring to when I mentioned an exponential graph.
I don't think the question was meant to be over thought like that but I get what you're saying. So I think I was right and she's just a dumb c*nt.
Oh no don't get me wrong, the logical process for a trivial question would be definitely yours. I'm just attempting to alleviate your speculation by answering it from their POV.
Predator said:RAF said:Storm said:Or decrease efficiency. Too many men could hinder further progress.
Exactly, but nonetheless, you must consider it (from their point of view) just as an acceleration graph would be considered in regards to a velocity graph.
Gengar said:I don't think the question was meant to be over thought like that but I get what you're saying. So I think I was right and she's just a dumb c*nt.
Oh no don't get me wrong, the logical process for a trivial question would be definitely yours. I'm just attempting to alleviate your speculation by answering it from their POV.
Why must your replies seem so intelligent.
Predator said:Could definitely be better? I'm not sure whether to feel retarded or just try and act intelligentAlso yeah, about 3-5 (rough estimate) of my friends on FB aren't 100% entirely retarded.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?