Why do sponsers have such high reputation effects

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ireppgold said:
Normal members shouldn't even be able to give rep, that's rediculous.

q4t

@"Carbon"

idk why he didn't take your RSGP but i paid 32M in RSGP for sponsor
 
PedoBear said:
I disagree, you shell out 25$ for Sponsor, you should get something more than a flashy userbar.
$25 or 30m+ we should get a little bit of rep. If we abuse it we get banned.

/account
 

I don't get what you are saying?

I meant Super Mods.

I honestly think the reputation system is fine as it is, but I do believe Super Mods should have a little more reputation power.
 
Na elite should still be -3 +3, maybe put super mods up to 5 or 6
 
regular member: 1
elite: 2
sponsor: 4
developer: 4?
moderator: 5
super moderator: 6
management: 8-10
That's what I think would be more balanced seeming you pay a lot less for elite.
 
wtf, development should get anything, there just like the group "writers" and i dont see them in that list.

regular member: 0
elite: 3
sponsor: 4
moderator: 4- i dont see why it should be able to give more rep.
super moderator: 6
management: 8-10
 
Ireppgold said:
wtf, development should get anything, there just like the group "writers" and i dont see them in that list.

regular member: 0
elite: 3
sponsor: 4
moderator: 4- i dont see why it should be able to give more rep.
super moderator: 6
management: 8-10

We give +3's, what you talking about?

Regular: 1
RG Elite: 3
Sponsor: 3
Moderator: 4
Staff: 4
Management: 6.
 
elite and sponsor both give +3? wtf rofl, then why buy sponsor ?
 
Oxide said:
Normal - 1
Elite - 3
Sponsor - 4
Mod - 5
Staff - 6
Management 8-10

Simple, everyone's happy then.
if normal- 0, then its mad.
 
Ireppgold said:
elite and sponsor both give +3? wtf rofl, then why buy sponsor ?

If people are buying Sponsor for reputation power, than that is pathetic.

This all seems unnecessary as the reputation system is fine as it is. Maybe the Super Mods should gain an extra point or two, but the rest are fine.

Whatever happens, doesn't really matter as reputation does nothing for someone.
 

If you're the one paying for the server, then fine, do what you want. But if someone is donating $25, then the least they can have is give a +4. Don't try to get their permissions lessened, as they deserve the least bit of permissions.
 

Then even out the rest of the groups "permissions"
 
So how much do normal members like me get to give people? +1?
Maybe the higher YOUR rep the more/less rep you can give?
 
Fawkes said:
So how much do normal members like me get to give people? +1?
Maybe the higher YOUR rep the more/less rep you can give?
Normal members giving +1/-1 is fine imo.


Carbon said:
Then even out the rest of the groups "permissions"
No? I think it's fine how it is. Donate more, get more permissions. And, Mod/Staff already get a special bonus.
 

You're a sponser, conflict of interests.
 
Yeah, and it cost A LOT, therefore we deserve it.
 


You claim "It cost's a lot", yet in your signature it thanks Inxy for FUNDING your sponsor? bigspenda.


I think it's rather funny how all the Sponsor's agree with the current system, the only people who don't agree are the people who aren't..
 


Because it benefits them. And, it cost HIM a lot, so it still cost a lot. And, we don't want to be ripped off the major amount of $/RSGP spent.

Why is the system frowned upon by you guys anyway?
 
Rainy_ said:
You claim "It cost's a lot", yet in your signature it thanks Inxy for FUNDING your sponsor? bigspenda.


I think it's rather funny how all the Sponsor's agree with the current system, the only people who don't agree are the people who aren't..



Because if you paid $25, you would want the extra permissions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…