wale said:
No because he doesn't fall under any of the categories of Agnosticism. It seems that he is just undecided not because evidence leaves him to be but because he doesn't know which evidence to follow.
If 'he doesn't know which evidence to follow', theoretically, it's the topic of insufficient or lacking evidence that is influencing his perspective.
In other words;
'Being undecided because evidence leaves him to be' is essentially the same thing as being 'undecided because he doesn't know which evidence to follow'. It's the fact that he doesn't know which evidence to follow that makes it so that he undecided. Understand?
I hope I didn't lose you. Bottom line, there is no other option for him. Atheist, theist or agnostic (besides the rest of the religions). This agnostic perspective was created and is defined in an effort to uniformly group everyone else together that isn't already sharing a common belief. So in theory, it's like saying, you have no choice to be part of one. It's like saying, I'm not Hispanic, African-American, Caucasian,etc. Then what are you?