┌∩┠◕_◕ ┌∩┠said:My opinion is that it should be between Libya and Libya, other countries have no right to interfere.
Cookies?
LMCampbell said:So Hitler killing the German Jews is fine because it's German V German.
Because that's basically what it is, but there aren't any concentration camps there just being killed through fighting.
Wormag said:I don't really know the whole concept due to the fact that I'm not really keen on politics and news - although I do like to keep myself updated.
Despite the fact that their government might be slightly? corrupted - I don't see the need for the US and UK to intervene with the situation as it is just costing our country money and also people which may decrease the global economy rate.
Yes.LMCampbell said:┌∩┠◕_◕ ┌∩┠said:My opinion is that it should be between Libya and Libya, other countries have no right to interfere.
Cookies?
So Hitler killing the German Jews is fine because it's German V German.
Because that's basically what it is, but there aren't any concentration camps there just being killed through fighting.
Roobik said:Wormag said:I don't really know the whole concept due to the fact that I'm not really keen on politics and news - although I do like to keep myself updated.
Despite the fact that their government might be slightly? corrupted - I don't see the need for the US and UK to intervene with the situation as it is just costing our country money and also people which may decrease the global economy rate.
First of all the government is not just "slightly" corrupt, when this whole thing started many people in state such as generals and other leaders left the government because they didn't accept the dictator's rules. As each one left they released a whole bunch of secret info, they basically did the "wiki leaks for Egypt". Documents concerning previous Egyptian war involvements, 'accidental' slaughterings, and other secrets that were supposed to be secret came out proving that the government has been lying and being very evil the past years.
The second part of your reply stated that you think this global aid system is "costing our country money and also people which may decrease the global economy rate." This statement justifies that you have very limited knowledge of the global market. Let's begin with war = money. When USA went to the middle east and spent over 10million dollars everyday keeping their troops held, cloths, armed America experienced one of it's greatest economic booms in the 50 years (trying not include the world wars). When a government spends that much money on war it feeds the whole world. During the afgany war the price of oil droped because US was basically drinking all middle east oil. War is a beautiful thing, it puts the government in dept but it creates jobs, moves money around, and feeds everybody... except the war victims. So this mission in the middle east is actually improving the DOW, it's great for everybody except some Americans because they're starting to see their shitty dollar dissolve.
Wormag said:Roobik said:Wormag said:I don't really know the whole concept due to the fact that I'm not really keen on politics and news - although I do like to keep myself updated.
Despite the fact that their government might be slightly? corrupted - I don't see the need for the US and UK to intervene with the situation as it is just costing our country money and also people which may decrease the global economy rate.
First of all the government is not just "slightly" corrupt, when this whole thing started many people in state such as generals and other leaders left the government because they didn't accept the dictator's rules. As each one left they released a whole bunch of secret info, they basically did the "wiki leaks for Egypt". Documents concerning previous Egyptian war involvements, 'accidental' slaughterings, and other secrets that were supposed to be secret came out proving that the government has been lying and being very evil the past years.
The second part of your reply stated that you think this global aid system is "costing our country money and also people which may decrease the global economy rate." This statement justifies that you have very limited knowledge of the global market. Let's begin with war = money. When USA went to the middle east and spent over 10million dollars everyday keeping their troops held, cloths, armed America experienced one of it's greatest economic booms in the 50 years (trying not include the world wars). When a government spends that much money on war it feeds the whole world. During the afgany war the price of oil droped because US was basically drinking all middle east oil. War is a beautiful thing, it puts the government in dept but it creates jobs, moves money around, and feeds everybody... except the war victims. So this mission in the middle east is actually improving the DOW, it's great for everybody except some Americans because they're starting to see their shitty dollar dissolve.
The economy drops because the countries that are at war against each other, or the ones that are involved have to pay for supplies, equipment, transport and other things. Although you mentioned that a country may buy these kind of supplies off other countries, thus giving them more wealth and money, the country that is spending all that money is sooner or later gonna loose some economy.
It is not a balanced trade.
Crayo said:Whether the mild scale of global economy justifies going to war is a different matter, because I do think it is just "minor". I'm glad the US, UK and I swear France are involved because as capitalists I do think it's our duty to put things right. However, whether they're only getting involved with Libya because it has a lot less power than let's say North Korea (who are also under a dictator, and do horrible things..) is a different subject.
I've grown a lot of hate for this "dictator" of Libya over the few days I've got interested in this subject, so maybe my personal hate is making my bias but I'm all for this invasion. From what I see the war in Afghanistan is coming to a close? Once again my knowledge is rather limited in this subject as well, but from recent news reports it looks like the American/UK army are unionizing the Afghanistan army and slowly giving them control again. So hopefully lots of troops will be pulled back soon.
Crayo said:Wow that's fascinating. But the guy is paranoid. I really wish they did just hire an Assassin and get it over and done with.
Roobik said:"...he deserves to die..." I think that's a bit too farHe's as human as you and me, maybe he's not so bad, maybe he's a teddy bear loving father who's going through a rough time. Maybe the media is simply portraying him to be evil while he's actually nice. Idk, I just know that you can say what you said, that's too far.
Crayo said:Roobik said:"...he deserves to die..." I think that's a bit too farHe's as human as you and me, maybe he's not so bad, maybe he's a teddy bear loving father who's going through a rough time. Maybe the media is simply portraying him to be evil while he's actually nice. Idk, I just know that you can say what you said, that's too far.
Too far? Are you serious? Since I've been interested in this reading the things he's done is horrific. He's slaughtering civilians because they are protesting against his government, which is as similar to Hitlers as any other. Just because America step in and help out, doesn't make him a victim what so ever. Sadam deserved to die, Osama deserves to die, Hitler deserved to die and so does this guy. Sorry, but I don't see how you can disagree.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?