Suggestion for new rule

Status
Not open for further replies.

Relapse

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Seems like it should be against the rules for members to make threads for limited people. Aren't they limited for a reason?
 
Yes, but I'll continue to get people to make threads just without saying "- Automatic Coding" at the end. So in fact all you're asking me to do is not be honest with you.
 
But AC has managed to acquire his group of buttbuddy's that will do anything for him, that's why it's happening.
 
George said:
But AC has managed to acquire his group of buttbuddy's that will do anything for him, that's why it's happening.

Because making a thread for someone means that you'll do anything for them.
 
James said:
George said:
But AC has managed to acquire his group of buttbuddy's that will do anything for him, that's why it's happening.

Because making a thread for someone means that you'll do anything for them.

He's limited for a reason, You are his buttbuddy, You post threads for him.

Buttbuddy = You.
 
It's already against the rules. If you see it, report it. The person posting the thread will be punished.
 
George said:
James said:
George said:
But AC has managed to acquire his group of buttbuddy's that will do anything for him, that's why it's happening.

Because making a thread for someone means that you'll do anything for them.

He's limited for a reason, You are his buttbuddy, You post threads for him.

Buttbuddy = You.

I made one thread for for him, so I posted A thread for him. And we are butt-buddies, problem?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top