Absolutely not. Just a boldening of the current username its the only option for group owners right now and costs 100 dollars. The only group with it right now is superior if you want to see an example.
No, because if it was $5 we wouldn't make any money. Well we would, but much less than what we can make now. Just think 2 groups have bold username color. That's $200 that goes to the site to make it more protected and secure right there.
No, because if it was $5 we wouldn't make any money. Well we would, but much less than what we can make now. Just think 2 groups have bold username color. That's $200 that goes to the site to make it more protected and secure right there.
Exactly. It's like a big money trap, (but in a good way) because Philly gets the money for the bold usernames then if a member doesn't meet the requirements for the group and that user likes the group with the username bold they can buy their way in. Causing more money.
No, because if it was $5 we wouldn't make any money. Well we would, but much less than what we can make now. Just think 2 groups have bold username color. That's $200 that goes to the site to make it more protected and secure right there.
The site is relatively secure except for one exploit that was difficult to discover. I think Philly said he's found it, but I'm not sure. The actual webhosting of this site has triple security on it, there isn't much more he can add without fixing this one minor loophole that doesn't allow for much freedom for hackers.