MinecraftGeek said:We shouldn't have the reputation report system. If someone has been given a neg unfairly (not likely) they should post it in the private inquires section. There should be a button where you view rep to take you to a help document telling you how to deal with rep abuse.
Same here, If you neg someone you expect it to stay there, If everyone is going to report the neg there is no point in a neg rep system. The way I said would benefit the forum in more ways what do you think?Satan said:That's what I'm hoping happens. I dislike the current method of reporting reputation.
Ocean said:Philly added it back though.
No, reputation does not determine a person's trust level, but it determines the worth of a person's account, and you shouldn't buy something that is worth more than the seller's account. That's how you get scammed.
Yes, people can and do rep4rep all the time, but it's still time and worth put onto that person's account.
Satan said:I can vouch for this. Honestly, Chronos and Phantom were two of the best.
Bomb said:Can you make a tl;dr
I'm not going to read all of that
Satan said:No. If you can't be bothered reading a suggestion, exit out of the thread. Thanks.
YEAH BRO NO ONE GIVES A FUCK!Bomb said:No one gives a fuck about your lil suggestion
Bomb said:Lol why are you such a faggot?
No one gives a fuck about your lil suggestion
Holographic said:In that case you should never deal with someone on FK cause nobodys account except for maybe mine or Philly's is worth more than something they are selling.
b) Philly reimplemented it against his will because of the entire forum bitching about it
Jason said:A member on here admitted to scamming someone in-real-life for $300, I gave him three negative reputations and they were all removed. I put my strong beliefs in those negative reputations, and to see them simply vanish for no reason considering they weren't rep abuse is astonishing. I honestly think staff doesn't want to deal with or hear about anyone's complaining, so they remove all reported reputations.
You took back "grind" and then ignored my PMs.Jason said:I never sold Oklahoma, buddy. Oh, and can you direct me to a scam report with valid proof for any other YouTube? No you can not, because there is absolutely none. Either way, I don't care what you have to say, because without proof, lies little meaningless accusations. If you have any thing else to say, you can contact me via PM. Thank you.
Phantom said:That's what happens when a bunch of repwhores and postwhores get staff.
All active HQ staff have gone now and it seems like FK is being ran by kids.
Phantom said:Nah I'm hardly even on FK now so that would be kinda pointless.
Still waiting for Philly to tell me why I was demoted lol.
Chronos said:Was the kid you're talking about the one who scammed the guy on Craigslist for a banned Xbox or something? I remember negging him, not sure why they would be removed. Sure some of them broke the rules with some vulgarity but the majority were clean, and all were valid. I do agree there should be one person who moderates reputation, and only reputation. Staff and Moderators can bother with their own section and not just remove reputations out of laziness or naivety (whichever the case).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?