Pardon Request Suggestion

I think it's unfair that banned members that have had multiple chances are trying to get back in as well as they're almost making it. I propose if you have been banned, but were allowed back previously and you got perm'd again you shouldn't be allowed to make a pardon request thread. 1 chance is more than enough, and quite honestly if you get perm'd twice from this site you don't belong here because it's only a matter of time before you fuck up again. If it were up to me scammers, and turboer's should not even be allowed to make pardon request threads. My second and final suggestion is, if you were a scammer or turboer you should be blocked from viewing any marketplace related section via AdminCP. I know you can do it because i was able to do it on "Beats" site.

TLR
My suggestions are
1. If you were let back previously after getting banned and you got perm'd again you don't belong here or making a pardon request; 1 chance is more than enough and it's only a matter of time before you mess up again.
2. If you were banned for scamming you should be blocked from any marketplace section. If you were banned for turboing you should be banned from any xbox related section or just banned from all marketplace sections via AdminCP.

Yeah I do agree that everyone deserves a second chance, but that's about it.

I agree with the first one.

Yeah I agree. I think if you scammed you shouldn't be able to do deals unless your paying in like moneypak or something that you cannot scam with.

Agreed ,tbh i don`t find that letting people back on the site if they`ve messed up twice. 1 change is enough like you said.

1. I agree with your first suggestion. I'll see that it gets discussed with other staff.

2. Yes, of course. That's something which we wanted in DWC. It's not a hard thing to do. A matter of implementing forcing custom user permissions, without adding them to a group.

You have 100% support from me on all counts there Shadow, lock them out of the marketplace imo.

Jimmy said:

1. I agree with your first suggestion. I'll see that it gets discussed with other staff.

2. Yes, of course. That's something which we wanted in DWC. It's not a hard thing to do. A matter of implementing forcing custom user permissions, without adding them to a group.

Click to expand...

Glad you guys like this. Hopefully this gets passed cause i'd hate for a scammer to be let back, act friendly, and scam somebody when they least expect it.

I actually love these suggestions. Implement them now.