Joel said:Thanks @"Unspoken", I kept forgetting what TL;DR means, but yes that took a long time to read and I had already read some. Agree to the contest, Relapse we want you online, will be insane waiting for results, anyways, not to get off-topic or anything..
Maybe there should be clearer rules next time, 5-10% deduction of points for multiple messages that classify as spam. (Only applies to those ahead)
It was also very unprofessional of what most mods did, tbh the one person that went from immature to mature was the person I least expected, @"Mike". Kudos to @"Mike", definitely leading by example.
wale said:You really should read the rules, if you want to accuse me of low quality posting I would understand that.
1. No spam, all posts must be of high quality.
if you want to accuse me of low quality posting I would understand that.
Solidify said:fatMatch said:Why does any of this matter?
Although I'm not addressing anyone in particular in this thread - or anyone who was involved in this whole ordeal - what's done is done.
By turning this into an ongoing debate, you're just keeping things heated when they should be cooling down.
Please, for the love of Christ, just let this thread, and the whole ordeal die. Things that are out of whack will sort themselves out eventually.
There's nothing wrong with what we're doing here. Nobody has flammed anyone and we're just sorting this out. You're here telling us 'Why does any of this matter?' but what does this thread change in your life? You're not obliged to be here if yo don't want to.
wale said:When did I call them a liar for banning me for spamming? I disagree that it was spam because the help documents say otherwise. It is up to them to give me a ban, if they wanted to it could have been a simple "don't like you"... I get why we got banned but I think the reason was wrong. Disagreeing and calling someone are different.
If anything I'm surprised your not limited for flaming...
I said you were banned for spamming and you said;
wale said:I don't think I spammed but that's not what this thread is about.
If Mike bans you for spamming and you say you didn't spam, I'm sorry, that's calling someone a liar, or saying you don't believe what they're saying. Phrase it however you want, but that's what its implying. And I didn't write the help documents man, but someone that did contribute to them (Mike) reviewed your case and decided to ban you. You can't get any more clear than that.
tbh the one person that went from immature to mature was the person I least expected, @"Mike". Kudos to @"Mike", definitely leading by example.
Why was he the person you least expected to go from immature to mature?
Solidify said:I don't know how else to make you understand they're essentially the same thing. That's it for me. Going to bed.
Solidify said:There's nothing wrong with what we're doing here. Nobody has flammed anyone and we're just sorting this out. You're here telling us 'Why does any of this matter?' but what does this thread change in your life? You're not obliged to be here if yo don't want to.
+ad.Vanquish said:Glad to see you fought for something you wanted, mad respect.
I'd like to know what happened, because I have no idea.
F*ck everyone who doesn't follow their heart.
fatMatch said:Solidify said:There's nothing wrong with what we're doing here. Nobody has flammed anyone and we're just sorting this out. You're here telling us 'Why does any of this matter?' but what does this thread change in your life? You're not obliged to be here if yo don't want to.
No, there's not necessarily anything wrong with what you're doing here. Thought nobody has been flamed, it seems as if this is a direct debate between you and @"wale" while everyone else seems to be for the most part, a neutral party. I was asking why any of this matters, because what's done is done, I wasn't telling you, hence the question mark. Despite you answering my question with a question, I'll answer yours. This thread changes nothing in my life, besides the atmosphere of RuneGear. I know I'm not obliged to be here, I just see a fair amount of negativity, and I don't feel that it's necessary. Why don't you and @"wale" sort this out over PM or something? That's all I'm really trying to say. Besides, you know how I feel about the events that transpired. Now to avoid any further discussion, I am in fact going to jump thread. Peace out.
+ad.Vanquish said:Glad to see you fought for something you wanted, mad respect.
I'd like to know what happened, because I have no idea.
F*ck everyone who doesn't follow their heart.
Relapse said:I use to respect you and considered you a very rational person, but over the last week or so it seems you've been picking childish fights and losing your composure, I don't know if somethings going on in your life and its none of my business but you've changed a lot.
I didn't read the rest of the thread so idk if you addressed that or not just saying what I think.
Relapse said:I use to respect you and considered you a very rational person, but over the last week or so it seems you've been picking childish fights and losing your composure, I don't know if somethings going on in your life and its none of my business but you've changed a lot.
I didn't read the rest of the thread so idk if you addressed that or not just saying what I think.
Xooley said:Okey, so I know it's all about this sh*t contest, mainly about wale and Crysis, but what did YOU exactly do?
Wasn't too active the last days so I didn't read trough all new threads..
Solidify said:You'd like to know what happened? Where did you last leave off and I'll fill in the gaps.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?