Started using Simba, so I'm curious :3
Ok in that case.. Goodbye simba :3Carbon said:Guaranteed ban, no matter how "randomised" it seems to be.
Carbon said:Coming from someone who has been botting since color autominers and woodcutters(Yes the ones from 06), you will get banned every time.
Kyle Undefined said:No offense, but you were probably using horribly written color scripts. I've used color bots since 08 and none of my accounts have been banned.
I abused one script for a week straight, on one account, and I still have it.
Carbon said:>Scripts
I'm talking about BEFORE scar, cobbled up colorfinders made in C++ were all "botters" had when I was botting.
OP, take the risk but don't make a thread about getting banned, you were warned.
So are you saying that the ones you used were a lot less advanced than scar?..Carbon said:>Scripts
I'm talking about BEFORE scar, cobbled up colorfinders made in C++ were all "botters" had when I was botting.
OP, take the risk but don't make a thread about getting banned, you were warned.
Kyle Undefined said:Well no wonder, those were horrible. You can't make an assumption based on outdated and old technology.
It also depends on the script maker themselves, I would never use a new scripters script purely because they don't have experience.
That's not the question though, I'm asking how detectable it is. And you stating that you're referring to the less sophisticated scripts from years ago doesn't really prove that color botting is detectableCarbon said:Even using scar, and it's clones.
Color/Injection botting will never get to the level of botting that people are used to.
Carbon said:Even using scar, and it's clones.
Color/Injection botting will never get to the level of botting that people are used to.
Kyle Undefined said:Have you checked out SCAR/Simba out recently? They're more advanced than what you're saying.
You're correct, color will never be as good as the Reflection bots, but they took the fun out of scripting. Doesn't mean they're useless and not worth it. They can be very advanced.
On a side note, we're actually working on a system that guarantees 100% item finding. It's coming together quite nicely, and I'm modifying some of the code now.
Feel free to come and see how advanced we can be, shoot me a PM if you ever do come. It just feels like no matter what I say, or bring up, your mind is set. Which is really unfortunate.
Godlike said:I'd use it not 24/7 it's very easy to detect and Fagex said They're saving the easiest for last and that equals.. Colour Bots.
Carbon said:I'm talking about the best available botting to a end user, no one other they chewy is interested in scripting.
I don't even play the game anymore, huehuehue.
I'd use it not 24/7 it's very easy to detect and Fagex said They're saving the easiest for last and that equals.. Colour Bots.
Kyle Undefined said:Where is your proof that it's easy to detect? Please, do share. Also, how is color bots easy to get rid of? They'd have to make RS grayscale in order to stop us for a week, then we'd come back and keep on going.
Carbon said:I'm talking about the best available botting to a end user, no one other they chewy is interested in scripting.
I don't even play the game anymore, huehuehue.
Well yeah, Simba isn't as simple as clicking download and run, but I like it the way it is since it's not spoon feeding people.
I don't play either, I just enjoy scripting. It's a nice break from my OOP job.
Godlike said:If they have the creator of RsBuddy on their team, Sure they'll find a easy way to get it gone. Lmfao, I'm right..
I have a feeling someone is making multiple accounts..Xori said:Simba is probably your best bet as far as avoiding bans goes, me and a few others used to tear up sudoku at next to instant mousespeeds for years, 150+ puzzles an hour, none of us received a single random event let alone a ban from it.
Would you like to present a logical argument to back that up?