[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]@Cann!bal[/font] <-- Y'all should tag him for me seeing as I can't figure it out on my own.
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Your misconceived accusations are intolerable. Stop saying sexual fluidity is how sexuality is accepted by the scientific and psychological professional communities. It isn't. [/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]You clearly haven't done your homework, but that's no surprise. You probably dropped out of high school for similar reasons. S[/font]exual[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif] fluidity is a mere theory, which means your entire structure for this argument is hypothetical. That's like jumping out of an airplane with intent to land on a cloud. The cloud is there, but you can't stand firm on it. In likeness, the theory is there, but you can't stand firm on it because it's theory without sufficient evidence. [/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]This is probably the part where you're getting all worked up and thinking of something stupid to say. I urge thee to refrain. In fact, you need not worry! [/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]I am aware that the notion of reading something which lacks [/font][/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]mazes, coloring areas, and pop-up pictures can be intimidating for an incompetent bigot, so[/font][/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif] I'll do the research for you.[/font][/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]We're going to be looking at pieces from Lisa M. Diamond, a respected psychologist at the University of Utah who has written many scientific pieces on sexuality and is an authority on the subject matter. From this we may depict what the accepted consensus of sexuality is within the professional communities. Brace yourself. This is some groundbreaking stuff.[/font][/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Well, there goes your entire argument on everybody is inherently subjected to this standard because you like boys. Even so, I'll continue...[/font][/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]I wanted to put this section in for a very specific reason. She makes a suggestion, better known in the scientific community as a hypothesis (you learn something new every day!), declaring yet another theory pertinent to female proneness vs. that of men. BUT... she concludes with acknowledging the lack of factual evidence and, therefore, doesn't have the jurisdiction to be an authority, citing a lack of substantial empirical evidence.[/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Anotha one,[/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]She concludes,[/font][/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Yes, you are a...[/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]
Who deleted the responses and for what reason?
@philly @raptor @plague @color @fear
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Your misconceived accusations are intolerable. Stop saying sexual fluidity is how sexuality is accepted by the scientific and psychological professional communities. It isn't. [/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]You clearly haven't done your homework, but that's no surprise. You probably dropped out of high school for similar reasons. S[/font]exual[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif] fluidity is a mere theory, which means your entire structure for this argument is hypothetical. That's like jumping out of an airplane with intent to land on a cloud. The cloud is there, but you can't stand firm on it. In likeness, the theory is there, but you can't stand firm on it because it's theory without sufficient evidence. [/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]This is probably the part where you're getting all worked up and thinking of something stupid to say. I urge thee to refrain. In fact, you need not worry! [/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]I am aware that the notion of reading something which lacks [/font][/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]mazes, coloring areas, and pop-up pictures can be intimidating for an incompetent bigot, so[/font][/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif] I'll do the research for you.[/font][/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]We're going to be looking at pieces from Lisa M. Diamond, a respected psychologist at the University of Utah who has written many scientific pieces on sexuality and is an authority on the subject matter. From this we may depict what the accepted consensus of sexuality is within the professional communities. Brace yourself. This is some groundbreaking stuff.[/font][/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Oh sSsSsSsSshiiiiiit. What does this mean? Well, [/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]if[/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif] [/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]you[/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif] [/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]are a male and[/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif] [/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]you[/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif] have the desire[/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif] to put the penis of another man in your mouth, you are homosexual. [/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Similarly, if [/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]you[/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif] are a male and [/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]you[/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif] want to see a pair of DD's in your face, you are heterosexual. [/font][/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]She goes on to say,[/font][/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Well, there goes your entire argument on everybody is inherently subjected to this standard because you like boys. Even so, I'll continue...[/font][/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]I wanted to put this section in for a very specific reason. She makes a suggestion, better known in the scientific community as a hypothesis (you learn something new every day!), declaring yet another theory pertinent to female proneness vs. that of men. BUT... she concludes with acknowledging the lack of factual evidence and, therefore, doesn't have the jurisdiction to be an authority, citing a lack of substantial empirical evidence.[/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Anotha one,[/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Yep. You were wrong again, Cannibitch. Turns out your claim of cultural influences and triggers of bisexual curiosity have NOT been studied adequately. Hmmm.[/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]She concludes,[/font][/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]WOW. Would you look at that? Your insufferable blabbering... it's... it's wrong?! If only there would've been people posting replies to try to tell you this! Oh wait... we did. You blabbered [font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]impetuously, accusing us of being dick-lovers when so many of us told you how we've never once desired a man. Even so, you stood resolute in your ineptitude, [/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]monotonously [/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]diluting facts with your[/font][font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif] insecurity and [/font]idiocy[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif].[/font][/font]
Cann!bal said:
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Yes, you are a...[/font]
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]
Who deleted the responses and for what reason?
@philly @raptor @plague @color @fear