Deal With Caution

Status
Not open for further replies.

Beam

Power member.
Reputation
0
So why do some users get to be pardoned back without Deal With Caution?

They actually scammed someone, then took the ban. Now they are let back without DWC after paying the guy back and making a pardon.

In my case, I was never supposed to be banned at all, I had the item back in the persons hands within 24 hours of my ban. Then I have to wait 1.5 months for a pardon and I get DWC?

This makes no sense to me really, and I am even willing to be Verified to get out of this flawed situation.
 
beam should be taken out of DWC tbh
 
Fiend said:
this was because.

1. I paid the user back literally 4-6 months ago before i bothered making my pardon requests(basically time it took to get out of DWC)
2.Philly deemed it unecessary

Well my DWC was completely unescessary.

I am not trying to get you DWC, I am trying to get ME out of it. You are how people should be pardoned. I Agree with you not getting DWC Rey.

I should not be in this disgrace.
 
Beam said:
Well my DWC was completely unescessary.

I am not trying to get you DWC, I am trying to get ME out of it. You are how people should be pardoned. I Agree with you not getting DWC Rey.

I should not be in this disgrace.
I am not sure what the criteria are, but I was told that it was not necessary for me. I believe you should be taken out of it as you are very trustworthy even rn.
 
Why don't you just not do anything fishy to get it in the first place.
 
Rare said:
Why don't you just not do anything fishy to get it in the first place.
You don't even know the circumstances as to how he was banned so shut your trap
 
Everyone tells me good shit about @beam
I'd like to see your DWC gone because I know you've got nice stuff to contribute to the market.
 
I know one user who scammed and isn't wearing the dwc bar and he's posting all over the marketplace. I'm most likely just going to verify.
 
I still have yet talked to Philly, after he did say he'd talk to me in the New Year.

I do agree to this though
 
Like @fear said (not exact idea), scammers should not be allowed back really.
Consider yourselves lucky please. Imo all scammers should have to wear DWC but it's my own opinion.


I mean people do make mistakes and can change, but why complain about having to wear DWC when really it serves you right for your history? General idea, not solely aimed at OP.
 



I am not a scammer, that is why I am disputing this.
 
Beam said:
I am not a scammer, that is why I am disputing this.
The Lord @Philly runs this play ground if he decided not to place him in the group so be it. You can contact @Philly via PM making it public isn't needed.  Closing the thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…