Storm said:Good in theory, but you should just make it an automated function.
It involves too much work on your part otherwise.
Not necessarily. You're introducing a posting award system. How it's awarded won't impact upon the end result. Spammers who spam to get the award will generally spam regardless, and then that's when you (or other admins/staff) should step in to evaluate such members/take action accordingly. It requires a lot less work and is much more efficient.Mike said:If it was automatic... there would be spam everywhere.
Storm said:Not necessarily. You're introducing a posting award system. How it's awarded won't impact upon the end result. Spammers who spam to get the award will generally spam regardless, and then that's when you (or other admins/staff) should step in to evaluate such members/take action accordingly. It requires a lot less work and is much more efficient.
If this forum picks up again, even people who enjoy such work will either get fed up with it eventually or simply just not have enough time to 'thoroughly' evaluate members' posts.
The Elite said:Test
Touche said:We should definitely automate these, better than manual awarding.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?