On the shroud there are burns.
http://www.shroudofturin4journalists.com/Details/poker.htm
Those burns is what probably lead to it being from the medieval times.
Carbon dating isn't wrong, but rather more of a mix-up, and you're IGNORING everything I've given you.
K.
The shroud was taken and used as a form of evidence throughout the years. Basically if you did some research, instead of me having to spoon-feed you the information that could've taken you half the time to reply to this, you would get somewhere.
The "fact" you conclude in your sentence is...
Excuse me?
I probably know much more about astrology, biology, and chemistry then your feeble mind could even handle, and you're saying I have no belief in "fact", only "faith".
That's where your true ignorance kicks in.
Wow, I really thought you could do some research.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shroud_of_Turin_Research_Project
"We can conclude for now that the Shroud image is that of a real human form of a scourged, crucified man. It is not the product of an artist. The blood stains are composed of...
Oh, rofl. Sorry, my mind is a bit ballsy atm,
I honestly do not know, I went to go spray-paint my helmet. I saw it going on, and I was like :O!
Then grabbed my camera.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.