Search results

This statement right here proves my point that you cannot read. This entire time that is exactly what I have been claiming. I am out of this thread, I am sick of arguing with illiterate baboons. I truly believe if you went to school you wouldn't even be able to hold a 1.8 gpa in any...

yup. i do and whatever you want to say is the smallest particle would have been created by God. I am not claiming adam and eve created that it would be prepostorous. Evolution is a legitimate and acceptable theory. Even the Roman Catholic church accepts it as correct. anyways I wont be...

Lol if you think that is an argument against God, then I have you are committing an argument from ignorance as well LOL! How do you know there must be NO GOD? You simply don't know that, therefore, it's an argument from ignorance. YOU'RE SO STUBBORN!!! On a more serious note; You...

God, the creator of the universe eternal and outside the 'system'. Closest defined God would be Arsitotle's God [hr] how is it an argument from ignorance explain. Everyone one of your responses to this thread as follows: I provide a logical explanation you claim its some sort of...

Same goes for believing in God. just because I believe in God doesnt mean I have to believe hes omniscient omnipotent or in Jesus or anything else lol.

How can there logically not be a primary creator? Show me how my logic is wrong. It is not an argument from ignorance because there is a logical chain that is followed.

You are quite confused Leader I am not claiming God lives in the sky or loves humanity, nor does that need to be true to prove 'God' exists. God and the Big Bang theory can co-exist so can God and science. The big bang theory still requires the original partice/atom/small universe that...

What have we discovered about our universe that would invalidate there being a primary creator. Also there would HAVE to be a primary creator otherwise our universe would be infinite and have no finite start point, which we know by science is not true.

You saying no without any logic or evidence seems absurd. There is obviously a chain of creation and the beginning of the chain there MUST be a primary creator. The primary creator logically could not have been created since he would therefore not be the primary creator by definition. I fail to...

Quite a rude comment also you have no idea what 'brand of bullshit' i subscribe too. You would be surprised what religion I actually follow. As for your second question considering he wasn't created since he was the primary creator, he just simply existed. or was there.

were not discussing jesus christ or christianity only God. (very different things) => Considering the argument is that God was the first being who created without being created, yes he always was. (PLEASE PLEASE READ MY POST BEFORE YOU RESPOND I DONT HAVE TIME FOR PEOPLE WHO REFUSE TO READ) I...

So, I have yet to see any evidence that you have put forward as to what the primary creator would be other than God. For logic would dictate that there be a primary creator who was not created.

Now I have a question for you, Do you believe in miracles? Do you believe a miracle can occur? Can someone miraculously be healed of cancer?

the twitter Inheritance looks very nice. I would suggest buying it if your into twitters

Do me a favor before you reply. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE thoroughly READ the entire argument letter for letter and respond in a way that actually disproves my argument with EVIDENCE. For I have seen no such attempts on your part. Since you were the one that provided the thesis stating 'All arguments...

There cannot be a creator of the first creator by definition. It seems that you do not only not understand the argument put forward as well as taking it out of context. 1) I'm no 100% sure on how full happened but it still follows under the premise of creator and created. and Falls within the...

Who do you align yourself with more. Aristotle or Augustine?

science and god can and do co-exist. saying that dont would be ignorant. even the church accepts this as fact.

I did say to be patient in my introductory paragraph. Please stop being so rude, the key to a sound argument is a slow build up this way we are not lost on the way to the solution! Now, since we both agree that everything is created in order to exist following the line of reasoning we have...

Of course someone created you. And the obvious answer would be your mother. Everything in the world has a creator. For to exist in the world you must first be created. Can we both not agree on that? It would be quiet naive to say otherwise. Now, for my second question Who created your mother...